Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukas Oldenburg

dblp:322/8964 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Vision and language · 28%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
multimodal pretraining
0.812024
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining
0.812024
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2024
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology
0.812024
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2024
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology › histopathology image analysis
whole slide image analysis
0.812024
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.612022
Utilizing Expert Features for Contrastive Learning of Time-Series Representations · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › sequence representation learning
time series representation learning
0.612022
Utilizing Expert Features for Contrastive Learning of Time-Series Representations · ICML 2022
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
pathological image classification
0.212024
Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 2.1self-supervised learning · 1.5multimodal alignment · 1.5expert features · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Transcriptomics-Guided Slide Representation Learning in Computational Pathology
abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has been successful in building patch embeddings of small histology images (e.g.,$224\times 224$pixels), but scaling these models to learn slide embeddings from the entirety of giga-pixel whole-slide images (WSIs) remains challenging. Here, we leverage complementary information from gene expression profiles to guide slide representation learning using multi-modal pre-training. Expression profiles constitute highly detailed molecular descriptions of a tissue that we hypothesize offer a strong task-agnostic training signal for learning slide embeddings. Our slide and expression (S+E) pre-training strategy, called Tangle, employs modality-specific encoders, the outputs of which are aligned via contrastive learning. Tangle was pre-trained on samples from three different organs: liver (n=6,597 S+E pairs), breast (n=1,020), and lung (n=1,012) from two different species (Homo sapiens and Rattus norvegicus). Across three independent test datasets consisting of 1,265 breast WSIs, 1,946 lung WSIs, and 4,584 liver WSIs, Tangle shows significantly better few-shot performance compared to supervised and SSL baselines. When assessed using prototype-based classification and slide retrieval, Tangle also shows a substantial performance improvement over all baselines. Code available at https://github.com/mahmoodlab/TANGLE.
Guillaume Jaume, Lukas Oldenburg, Anurag Vaidya, Richard J. Chen, Drew F. K. Williamson, Thomas Peeters, Andrew H. Song, Faisal Mahmood 0001
CVPR2
2022 Utilizing Expert Features for Contrastive Learning of Time-Series Representations
abstract
We present an approach that incorporates expert knowledge for time-series representation learning. Our method employs expert features to replace the commonly used data transformations in previous contrastive learning approaches. We do this since time-series data frequently stems from the industrial or medical field where expert features are often available from domain experts, while transformations are generally elusive for time-series data. We start by proposing two properties that useful time-series representations should fulfill and show that current representation learning approaches do not ensure these properties. We therefore devise ExpCLR, a novel contrastive learning approach built on an objective that utilizes expert features to encourage both properties for the learned representation. Finally, we demonstrate on three real-world time-series datasets that ExpCLR surpasses several state-of-the-art methods for both unsupervised and semi-supervised representation learning.
Manuel Nonnenmacher, Lukas Oldenburg, Ingo Steinwart, David Reeb
ICML2