Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Issa Oe
dblp:322/9071
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0001-7216-2143ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Method · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
conjugate gradient |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Method · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Method · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Method · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conjugate gradient · 0.6Auto-PGD · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient MethodabstractDeep learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples, and adversarial attacks used to generate such examples have attracted considerable research interest. Although existing methods based on the steepest descent have achieved high attack success rates, ill-conditioned problems occasionally reduce their performance. To address this limitation, we utilize the conjugate gradient (CG) method, which is effective for this type of problem, and propose a novel attack algorithm inspired by the CG method, named the Auto Conjugate Gradient (ACG) attack. The results of large-scale evaluation experiments conducted on the latest robust models show that, for most models, ACG was able to find more adversarial examples with fewer iterations than the existing SOTA algorithm Auto-PGD (APGD). We investigated the difference in search performance between ACG and APGD in terms of diversification and intensification, and define a measure called Diversity Index (DI) to quantify the degree of diversity. From the analysis of the diversity using this index, we show that the more diverse search of the proposed method remarkably improves its attack success rate. Keiichiro Yamamura, Haruki Sato, Nariaki Tateiwa, Nozomi Hata, Toru Mitsutake, Issa Oe, Hiroki Ishikura, Katsuki Fujisawa |
ICML | 6 |