Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiding Zhu

dblp:322/9222 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 87% Program analysis · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
DataPrice: An Interactive System for Pricing Datasets in Data Marketplaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
shapley value
0.812024
DataPrice: An Interactive System for Pricing Datasets in Data Marketplaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Data integration and cleaning
data markets
0.812024
DataPrice: An Interactive System for Pricing Datasets in Data Marketplaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection
0.812024
How Does Code Optimization Impact Third-party Library Detection for Android Applications? · ASE 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
dependencies and software ecosystems
0.812024
How Does Code Optimization Impact Third-party Library Detection for Android Applications? · ASE 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › software dependencies
third-party library detection
0.812024
How Does Code Optimization Impact Third-party Library Detection for Android Applications? · ASE 2024
Computational finance and economics
pricing
0.212024
DataPrice: An Interactive System for Pricing Datasets in Data Marketplaces · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Program analysis
static analysis
0.212024
How Does Code Optimization Impact Third-party Library Detection for Android Applications? · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shapley value · 2.3pricing model · 2.3obfuscation resistance · 1.5code optimization analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 How Does Code Optimization Impact Third-party Library Detection for Android Applications?
abstract
Android applications (apps) widely use third-party libraries (TPLs) to reuse functionalities and simplify the development process. Unfortunately, these TPLs often suffer from vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit, leading to catastrophic consequences for app users. To mitigate this threat, researchers have developed tools to detect TPL versions in the app. If an app is found using a TPL vulnerable version, these tools will issue warnings. Although these tools claim to resist the effects of code obfuscation, our preliminary study indicates that code optimization is common during the app release process. A lack of consideration for the impact of code optimizations significantly reduces the effectiveness of existing tools. To fill this gap, this work systematically investigates how and to what extent different optimization strategies affect existing tools. Our findings have led to a new tool named LibHunter, designed to against major code optimization strategies (e.g., Inlining and CallSite Optimization) while also resisting code obfuscation and shrinking. Extensive evaluations on a dataset of apps with optimization, obfuscation, and shrinking enabled show LibHunter significantly outperforms existing tools. It achieves F1 value that surpass the best tools by 29.3% and 36.1% at the library and version levels, respectively. We also applied LibHunter to detect vulnerable TPLs in the top Google Play apps, which shows the scalability of our approach, as well as the potential of our approach to facilitate malware detection.
Zifan Xie, Ming Wen 0001, Tinghan Li, Yiding Zhu, Qinsheng Hou, Hai Jin 0001
ASE4
2024 DataPrice: An Interactive System for Pricing Datasets in Data Marketplaces
abstract
With the flourishing of data-driven applications, data marketplaces, which can dramatically facilitate data utilization, have emerged recently. However, determining the appropriate price for datasets presents a significant challenge due to the intangible nature of data. DataPrice alleviates the challenge by providing an interactive system based on a pricing model trained on real datasets collected from commercial data marketplaces. The pricing model can estimate an appropriate price according to the dataset description as a reference for both data sellers and data buyers. By leveraging Shapley values to evaluate the contribution of each attribute in metadata on the estimated price, DataPrice offers an explanation of the pricing process in a text form to enhance user trust.
Yiding Zhu, Jiayao Zhang 0006, Jinfei Liu, Kui Ren 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1