Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emanuele Zappala
dblp:323/5621
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9684-9441ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Language models and text generation · 27% Generative modeling · 24% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings · ICLR 2024 Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
causal language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Markovian Discrete Diffusion with Causal Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Markovian Discrete Diffusion with Causal Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Markovian Discrete Diffusion with Causal Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
emergent abilities |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Intelligence at the Edge of Chaos · ICLR 2025 |
Automata and formal languages
cellular automata |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Intelligence at the Edge of Chaos · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Continuous Spatiotemporal Transformer · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Continuous Spatiotemporal Transformer · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Intelligence at the Edge of Chaos · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural dynamics
brain dynamics modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model training · 1.7downstream task evaluation · 1.7zero-shot inference · 1.5masked-prediction training · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5neural network · 1.3integral operator learning · 1.3transformer · 0.9pretrained LLM weight reuse · 0.9sobolev space optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Intelligence at the Edge of ChaosabstractWe explore the emergence of intelligent behavior in artificial systems by investigating how the complexity of rule-based systems influences the capabilities of models trained to predict these rules. Our study focuses on elementary cellular automata (ECA), simple yet powerful one-dimensional systems that generate behaviors ranging from trivial to highly complex. By training distinct Large Language Models (LLMs) on different ECAs, we evaluated the relationship between the complexity of the rules' behavior and the intelligence exhibited by the LLMs, as reflected in their performance on downstream tasks. Our findings reveal that rules with higher complexity lead to models exhibiting greater intelligence, as demonstrated by their performance on reasoning and chess move prediction tasks. Both uniform and periodic systems, and often also highly chaotic systems, resulted in poorer downstream performance, highlighting a sweet spot of complexity conducive to intelligence. We conjecture that intelligence arises from the ability to predict complexity and that creating intelligence may require only exposure to complexity. Shiyang Zhang, Aakash Patel, Syed Asad Rizvi, Nianchen Liu, Sizhuang He, Amin Karbasi, Emanuele Zappala, David van Dijk |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2025 | Non-Markovian Discrete Diffusion with Causal Language ModelsabstractDiscrete diffusion models offer a flexible, controllable approach to structured sequence generation, yet they still lag behind causal language models in expressive power. A key limitation lies in their reliance on the Markovian assumption, which restricts each step to condition only on the current state, leading to potential uncorrectable error accumulation.
In this paper, We introduce CaDDi, a discrete diffusion model that conditions on the entire generative trajectory, thereby lifting the Markov constraint and allowing the model to revisit and improve past states. By unifying sequential (causal) and temporal (diffusion) reasoning in a single non‑Markovian transformer, CaDDi also treats standard causal language models as a special case and permits the direct reuse of pretrained LLM weights with no architectural changes. Empirically, CaDDi outperforms state‑of‑the‑art discrete diffusion baselines on natural‑language benchmarks, substantially narrowing the remaining gap to large autoregressive transformers. Yangtian Zhang, Sizhuang He, Daniel LeVine, Lawrence Zhao, Syed Asad Rizvi, Shiyang Zhang, Emanuele Zappala, Rex Ying, David van Dijk |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2024 | BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordingsabstractWe introduce the Brain Language Model (BrainLM), a foundation model for brain activity dynamics trained on 6,700 hours of fMRI recordings. Utilizing self-supervised masked-prediction training, BrainLM demonstrates proficiency in both fine-tuning and zero-shot inference tasks. Fine-tuning allows for the accurate prediction of clinical variables like age, anxiety, and PTSD as well as forecasting of future brain states. Critically, the model generalizes well to entirely new external cohorts not seen during training. In zero-shot inference mode, BrainLM can identify intrinsic functional networks directly from raw fMRI data without any network-based supervision during training. The model also generates interpretable latent representations that reveal relationships between brain activity patterns and cognitive states. Overall, BrainLM offers a versatile and interpretable framework for elucidating the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of human brain activity. It serves as a powerful "lens" through which massive repositories of fMRI data can be analyzed in new ways, enabling more effective interpretation and utilization at scale. The work demonstrates the potential of foundation models to advance computational neuroscience research. Josue Ortega Caro, Antonio H. O. Fonseca, Syed Asad Rizvi, Matteo Rosati, Christopher L. Averill, James L. Cross, Prateek Mittal, Emanuele Zappala, Rahul Madhav Dhodapkar, Chadi Abdallah, David van Dijk |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential EquationsabstractModeling continuous dynamical systems from discretely sampled observations is a fundamental problem in data science. Often, such dynamics are the result of non-local processes that present an integral over time. As such, these systems are modeled with Integro-Differential Equations (IDEs); generalizations of differential equations that comprise both an integral and a differential component. For example, brain dynamics are not accurately modeled by differential equations since their behavior is non-Markovian, i.e. dynamics are in part dictated by history. Here, we introduce the Neural IDE (NIDE), a novel deep learning framework based on the theory of IDEs where integral operators are learned using neural networks. We test NIDE on several toy and brain activity datasets and demonstrate that NIDE outperforms other models. These tasks include time extrapolation as well as predicting dynamics from unseen initial conditions, which we test on whole-cortex activity recordings in freely behaving mice. Further, we show that NIDE can decompose dynamics into their Markovian and non-Markovian constituents, via the learned integral operator, which we test on fMRI brain activity recordings of people on ketamine. Finally, the integrand of the integral operator provides a latent space that gives insight into the underlying dynamics, which we demonstrate on wide-field brain imaging recordings. Altogether, NIDE is a novel approach that enables modeling of complex non-local dynamics with neural networks. Emanuele Zappala, Antonio H. O. Fonseca, Andrew Henry Moberly, Michael James Higley, Chadi Abdallah, Jessica A. Cardin, David van Dijk |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Continuous Spatiotemporal TransformerabstractModeling spatiotemporal dynamical systems is a fundamental challenge in machine learning. Transformer models have been very successful in NLP and computer vision where they provide interpretable representations of data. However, a limitation of transformers in modeling continuous dynamical systems is that they are fundamentally discrete time and space models and thus have no guarantees regarding continuous sampling. To address this challenge, we present the Continuous Spatiotemporal Transformer (CST), a new transformer architecture that is designed for modeling of continuous systems. This new framework guarantees a continuous and smooth output via optimization in Sobolev space. We benchmark CST against traditional transformers as well as other spatiotemporal dynamics modeling methods and achieve superior performance in a number of tasks on synthetic and real systems, including learning brain dynamics from calcium imaging data. Antonio H. O. Fonseca, Emanuele Zappala, Josue Ortega Caro, David van Dijk |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Quantum Neural Networks and Topological Quantum Field Theories
Antonino Marciano, Deen Chen 0001, Filippo Fabrocini, Chris Fields 0001, Enrico Greco, Niels Gresnigt, Krid Jinklub, Matteo Lulli, Kostas Terzidis, Emanuele Zappala |
Neural Networks | 10 |