VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Kucera
dblp:324/0232
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4358-7932ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Multi-modal deep learning improves grain yield prediction in wheat breeding by fusing genomics and phenomics · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Multi-modal deep learning improves grain yield prediction in wheat breeding by fusing genomics and phenomics · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › plant biology
plant breeding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Multi-modal deep learning improves grain yield prediction in wheat breeding by fusing genomics and phenomics · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinShake: Building datasets and benchmarks for deep learning on protein structures · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinShake: Building datasets and benchmarks for deep learning on protein structures · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinShake: Building datasets and benchmarks for deep learning on protein structures · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
de novo protein design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Conditional generative modeling for de novo protein design with hierarchical functions · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Conditional generative modeling for de novo protein design with hierarchical functions · Bioinform. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
multimodal deep learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Multi-modal deep learning improves grain yield prediction in wheat breeding by fusing genomics and phenomics · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple instance learning · 1.3attention mechanism · 1.3deep learning · 1.2voxel grids · 0.7point cloud · 0.7graph neural network · 0.7generative adversarial network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ProteinShake: Building datasets and benchmarks for deep learning on protein structuresabstractWe present ProteinShake, a Python software package that simplifies datasetcreation and model evaluation for deep learning on protein structures. Users cancreate custom datasets or load an extensive set of pre-processed datasets fromthe Protein Data Bank (PDB) and AlphaFoldDB. Each dataset is associated withprediction tasks and evaluation functions covering a broad array of biologicalchallenges. A benchmark on these tasks shows that pre-training almost alwaysimproves performance, the optimal data modality (graphs, voxel grids, or pointclouds) is task-dependent, and models struggle to generalize to new structures.ProteinShake makes protein structure data easily accessible and comparisonamong models straightforward, providing challenging benchmark settings withreal-world implications.ProteinShake is available at: https://proteinshake.ai Tim Kucera, Carlos G. Oliver, Dexiong Chen, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Multi-modal deep learning improves grain yield prediction in wheat breeding by fusing genomics and phenomicsabstractMOTIVATION: Developing new crop varieties with superior performance is highly important to ensure robust and sustainable global food security. The speed of variety development is limited by long field cycles and advanced generation selections in plant breeding programs. While methods to predict yield from genotype or phenotype data have been proposed, improved performance and integrated models are needed. RESULTS: We propose a machine learning model that leverages both genotype and phenotype measurements by fusing genetic variants with multiple data sources collected by unmanned aerial systems. We use a deep multiple instance learning framework with an attention mechanism that sheds light on the importance given to each input during prediction, enhancing interpretability. Our model reaches 0.754 ± 0.024 Pearson correlation coefficient when predicting yield in similar environmental conditions; a 34.8% improvement over the genotype-only linear baseline (0.559 ± 0.050). We further predict yield on new lines in an unseen environment using only genotypes, obtaining a prediction accuracy of 0.386 ± 0.010, a 13.5% improvement over the linear baseline. Our multi-modal deep learning architecture efficiently accounts for plant health and environment, distilling the genetic contribution and providing excellent predictions. Yield prediction algorithms leveraging phenotypic observations during training therefore promise to improve breeding programs, ultimately speeding up delivery of improved varieties. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/PheGeMIL (code) and https://doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kprr4xh5p (data). Matteo Togninalli, Xu Wang 0008, Tim Kucera, Sandesh Shrestha, Philomin Juliana, Suchismita Mondal, Francisco Pinto Espinosa, Velu Govindan, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Julio Huerta-Espino, Ravi P. Singh, Karsten M. Borgwardt, Jesse Poland |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2022 | Conditional generative modeling for de novo protein design with hierarchical functionsabstractMOTIVATION: Protein design has become increasingly important for medical and biotechnological applications. Because of the complex mechanisms underlying protein formation, the creation of a novel protein requires tedious and time-consuming computational or experimental protocols. At the same time, machine learning has enabled the solving of complex problems by leveraging large amounts of available data, more recently with great improvements on the domain of generative modeling. Yet, generative models have mainly been applied to specific sub-problems of protein design. RESULTS: Here, we approach the problem of general-purpose protein design conditioned on functional labels of the hierarchical Gene Ontology. Since a canonical way to evaluate generative models in this domain is missing, we devise an evaluation scheme of several biologically and statistically inspired metrics. We then develop the conditional generative adversarial network ProteoGAN and show that it outperforms several classic and more recent deep-learning baselines for protein sequence generation. We further give insights into the model by analyzing hyperparameters and ablation baselines. Lastly, we hypothesize that a functionally conditional model could generate proteins with novel functions by combining labels and provide first steps into this direction of research. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and data underlying this article are available on GitHub at https://github.com/timkucera/proteogan, and can be accessed with doi:10.5281/zenodo.6591379. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplemental data are available at Bioinformatics online. Tim Kucera, Matteo Togninalli, Laetitia Meng-Papaxanthos |
Bioinform. | 1 |