Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Panjkovic
dblp:324/0947
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-5325-6745ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 62% Automata and formal languages · 38% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal planning |
3.7 | 5 | 2025 | Generalizing Platform-Aware Mission Planning for Infinite-State Timed Transition Systems · KR 2025 Platform-Aware Mission Planning · ICAPS 2025 Abstract Action Scheduling for Optimal Temporal Planning via OMT · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
mission planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Platform-Aware Mission Planning · ICAPS 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
infinite-state model checking |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing Platform-Aware Mission Planning for Infinite-State Timed Transition Systems · KR 2025 |
Automata and formal languages
timed automata |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing Platform-Aware Mission Planning for Infinite-State Timed Transition Systems · KR 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › real-time verification
timed transition systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Deciding Unsolvability in Temporal Planning under Action Non-Self-Overlapping · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
abstraction refinement · 2.5verification engine · 1.7temporal planning · 1.7infinite-state model checking · 1.7optimization modulo theories · 1.4model checking · 1.1heuristic search · 1.1difference bound matrices · 1.1abstract action scheduling · 0.8bounded planning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Platform-Aware Mission PlanningabstractPlanning for autonomous systems typically requires reasoning with models at different levels of abstraction, and the harmonization of two competing sets of objectives: high-level mission goals that refer to an interaction of the system with the external environment, and low-level platform constraints that aim to preserve the integrity and the correct interaction of the subsystems. The complicated interplay between these two models makes it very hard to reason on the system as a whole, especially when the objective is to find plans with robustness guarantees, considering the non-deterministic behavior of the lower layers of the system. In this paper, we introduce the problem of Platform-Aware Mission Planning (PAMP), addressing it in the setting of temporal durative actions. The PAMP problem differs from standard temporal planning for its exists-forall nature: the high-level plan dealing with mission goals is required to satisfy safety and executability constraints, for all the possible non-deterministic executions of the low-level model of the platform and the environment. We propose two approaches for solving PAMP. The first baseline approach amalgamates the mission and platform levels, while the second is based on an abstraction-refinement loop that leverages the combination of a planner and a verification engine. We prove the soundness and completeness of the proposed approaches and validate them experimentally, demonstrating the importance of heterogeneous modeling and the superiority of the technique based on abstraction-refinement. Stefan Panjkovic, Alessandro Cimatti, Andrea Micheli, Stefano Tonetta |
ICAPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Generalizing Platform-Aware Mission Planning for Infinite-State Timed Transition SystemsabstractThe Platform-Aware Mission Planning (PAMP) problem, formalizes the relationship between an automated temporal planning problem and an execution platform modeled as a Timed Automaton. The PAMP problem consists in finding a valid plan that guarantees the plan executability and the satisfaction of a safety property on the platform, regardless of non-determinism. In this paper, we significantly generalize the PAMP problem along three directions. First, we consider platforms represented as infinite state timed transition systems (TTSs), allowing a more natural and expressive modeling of realistic systems. Second, we introduce a new feature to model relations between the fluents of the planning problem and the platform variables. Finally, we generalize the semantics to cope with unbounded traces. We define a solution method for the resulting generalized PAMP, combining an automated temporal planner and an infinite-state model-checker. Our method is largely more efficient than the existing approach for bounded PAMP problems, despite being strictly more expressive. Stefan Panjkovic, Alessandro Cimatti, Andrea Micheli, Stefano Tonetta |
KR | 1 |
| 2024 | Abstract Action Scheduling for Optimal Temporal Planning via OMTabstractGiven the model of a system with explicit temporal constraints, optimal temporal planning is the problem of finding a schedule of actions that achieves a certain goal while optimizing an objective function. Recent approaches for optimal planning reduce the problem to a series of queries to an Optimization Modulo Theory (OMT) solver: each query encodes a bounded version of the problem, with additional abstract actions representing an over-approximation of the plans beyond the bound. This technique suffers from performance issues, mainly due to the looseness of the over-approximation, which can include many non-executable plans. In this paper, we propose a refined abstraction for solving optimal temporal planning via OMT by introducing abstract scheduling constraints, which have a double purpose. First, they enforce a partial ordering of abstract actions based on mutual dependencies between them, which leads to a better makespan estimation and allows to prove optimality sooner. Second, they implicitly forbid circular self-enabling of abstract actions, which is a common cause of spurious models that severely affects performance in existing approaches. We prove the soundness and completeness of the resulting approach and empirically demonstrate its superiority with respect to the state of the art. Stefan Panjkovic, Andrea Micheli |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Expressive Optimal Temporal Planning via Optimization Modulo TheoryabstractTemporal Planning is the problem of synthesizing a course of actions given a predictive model of a system subject to temporal constraints. This kind of planning finds natural applications in the automation of industrial processes and in robotics when the timing and deadlines are important. Finding any plan in temporal planning is often not enough as it is sometimes needed to optimize a certain objective function: particularly interesting are the minimization of the makespan and the optimization of the costs of actions. Despite the importance of the problem, only few works in the literature tackled the problem of optimal temporal planning because of the complicated intermix of planning and scheduling. In this paper, we address the problem of optimal temporal planning for a very expressive class of problems using a reduction of the bounded planning problem to Optimization Modulo Theory (OMT) a powerful discrete/continuous optimization framework. We theoretically and empirically show the expressive power of this approach and we set a baseline for future research in this area. Stefan Panjkovic, Andrea Micheli |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Deciding Unsolvability in Temporal Planning under Action Non-Self-OverlappingabstractThe field of Temporal Planning (TP) is receiving increasing interest for its many real-world applications. Most of the literature focuses on the TP problem of finding a plan, with algorithms that are not guaranteed to terminate when the problem admits no solution. In this paper, we present sound and complete decision procedures that address the dual problem of proving that no plan exists, which has important applications in oversubscription, model validation and optimization. We focus on the expressive and practically relevant semantics of action non-self-overlapping, recently proved to be PSPACE-complete. For this subclass, we propose two approaches: a reduction of the planning problem to model-checking of Timed Transition Systems, and a heuristic-search algorithm where temporal constraints are represented by Difference Bound Matrices. We implemented the approaches, and carried out an experimental evaluation against other state-of-the-art TP tools. On benchmarks that admit no plans, both approaches dramatically outperform the other planners, while the heuristic-search algorithm remains competitive on solvable benchmarks. Stefan Panjkovic, Andrea Micheli, Alessandro Cimatti |
AAAI | 1 |