Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Kaleab Belay

dblp:324/1060 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.612022
Gradient and Mangitude Based Pruning for Sparse Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
Gradient and Mangitude Based Pruning for Sparse Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse neural network
0.612022
Gradient and Mangitude Based Pruning for Sparse Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

magnitude-based pruning · 0.6gradient-based pruning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Gradient and Mangitude Based Pruning for Sparse Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Deep Neural Networks have memory and computational demands that often render them difficult to use in low-resource environments. Also, highly dense networks are over-parameterized and thus prone to overfitting. To address these problems, we introduce a novel algorithm that prunes (sparsifies) weights from the network by taking into account their magnitudes and gradients taken against a validation dataset. Unlike existing pruning methods, our method does not require the network model to be retrained once initial training is completed. On the CIFAR-10 dataset, our method reduced the number of paramters of MobileNet by a factor of 9X, from 14 million to 1.5 million, with just a 3.8% drop in accuracy.
Kaleab Belay
AAAI1