Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Niyati Chayya

dblp:324/1184 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Generative modeling · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › concept representation
semantic spaces
0.612022
The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Computational social science and digital humanities
argumentation
0.612022
Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022
Computational social science and digital humanities
computational linguistics
0.212022
The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical generative model · 1.1constraint-based modeling · 1.1BERT fine-tuning · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract)
abstract
Psychological concepts can help computational linguists to better model the latent semantic spaces of emotions, and understand the underlying states motivating the sharing or suppressing of emotions. This abstract applies the understanding of agency and social interaction in the happiness semantic space to its role in positive emotion. First, BERT-based fine-tuning yields an expanded seed set to understand the vocabulary of the latent space. Next, results benchmarked against many emotion datasets suggest that the approach is valid, robust, offers an improvement over direct prediction, and is useful for downstream predictive tasks related to psychological states.
Kokil Jaidka, Niyati Chayya
AAAI3
2022 Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract)
abstract
In contexts where debate and deliberation is the norm, participants are regularly presented with new information that conflicts with their original beliefs. When required to update their beliefs (belief alignment), they may choose arguments that align with their worldview (confirmation bias). We test this and competing hypotheses in a constraint-based modeling approach to predict the winning arguments in multi-party interactions in the Reddit ChangeMyView dataset. We impose structural constraints that reflect competing hypotheses on a hierarchical generative Variational Auto-encoder. Our findings suggest that when arguments are further from the initial belief state of the target, they are more likely to succeed.
Suzanna Sia, Kokil Jaidka, Niyati Chayya, Kevin Duh
AAAI3