Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sam Spilsbury
dblp:324/2046
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 61% Vision and language · 30% Multi-agent systems · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agent |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8few-shot prompting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language LearningabstractIn-Context-learning and few-shot prompting are viable methods compositional output generation.However, these methods can be very sensitive to the choice of support examples used.Retrieving good supports from the training data for a given test query is already a difficult problem, but in some cases solving this may not even be enough.We consider the setting of grounded language learning problems where finding relevant supports in the same or similar states as the query may be difficult.We design an agent which instead generates possible supports inputs and targets current state of the world, then uses them in-context-learning to solve the test query.We show substantially improved performance on a previously unsolved compositional generalization test without a loss of performance in other areas.The approach is general and can even scale to instructions expressed in natural language.0.61 h 0.57 ± .50 (60) 0.61 h 0.86 ± .34(266) 0.64 h 0.59 ± .49(743) 0.65 h 0.87 ± .33 (2655) 0.68 h 0.59 ± .49(2907) 0.69 h 0.88 ± .32 (8144) 0.71 h 0.63 ± .48(4412) 0.73 h 0.86 ± .35(7480) 0.74 h 0.80 ± .40 (6025) 0.77 h 0.78 ± .41(7283) 0.78 h 0.81 ± .39 (10824) 0.81 h 0.76 ± .43 (5358) Sam Spilsbury, Pekka Marttinen, Alexander Ilin |
EMNLP | 1 |