Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sam Spilsbury

dblp:324/2046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 61% Vision and language · 30% Multi-agent systems · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
0.812024
Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning
0.812024
Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agent
0.212024
Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8few-shot prompting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Generating Demonstrations for In-Context Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning
abstract
In-Context-learning and few-shot prompting are viable methods compositional output generation.However, these methods can be very sensitive to the choice of support examples used.Retrieving good supports from the training data for a given test query is already a difficult problem, but in some cases solving this may not even be enough.We consider the setting of grounded language learning problems where finding relevant supports in the same or similar states as the query may be difficult.We design an agent which instead generates possible supports inputs and targets current state of the world, then uses them in-context-learning to solve the test query.We show substantially improved performance on a previously unsolved compositional generalization test without a loss of performance in other areas.The approach is general and can even scale to instructions expressed in natural language.0.61 h 0.57 ± .50 (60) 0.61 h 0.86 ± .34(266) 0.64 h 0.59 ± .49(743) 0.65 h 0.87 ± .33 (2655) 0.68 h 0.59 ± .49(2907) 0.69 h 0.88 ± .32 (8144) 0.71 h 0.63 ± .48(4412) 0.73 h 0.86 ± .35(7480) 0.74 h 0.80 ± .40 (6025) 0.77 h 0.78 ± .41(7283) 0.78 h 0.81 ± .39 (10824) 0.81 h 0.76 ± .43 (5358)
Sam Spilsbury, Pekka Marttinen, Alexander Ilin
EMNLP1