Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Mourachko

dblp:324/2164 · also Alex Mourachko · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Machine translation · 79% Speech recognition and synthesis · 21%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › watermarking security › watermark attack
watermark forgery
0.912025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.912025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › watermarking security › watermark attack
watermark removal
0.912025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation
0.712023
BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
speech-to-speech translation
0.712023
BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation
0.312025
BOUQuET : dataset, Benchmark and Open initiative for Universal Quality Evaluation in Translation · EMNLP 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
generative model watermarking
0.312025
Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ranking loss · 0.9quality evaluation benchmark · 0.9preference model · 0.9backpropagation-based image optimization · 0.9text-free evaluation metric · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 BOUQuET : dataset, Benchmark and Open initiative for Universal Quality Evaluation in Translation
abstract
Pierre Andrews, Mikel Artetxe, Mariano Coria Meglioli, Marta R. Costa-jussà, Joe Chuang, David Dale, Mark Duppenthaler, Nathanial Paul Ekberg, Cynthia Gao, Daniel Edward Licht, Jean Maillard, Alexandre Mourachko, Christophe Ropers, Safiyyah Saleem, Eduardo Sánchez, Ioannis Tsiamas, Arina Turkatenko, Albert Ventayol-Boada, Shireen Yates. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Pierre Andrews, Mikel Artetxe, Mariano Coria Meglioli, Marta R. Costa-jussà, Joe Chuang, David Dale, Mark Duppenthaler, Nathanial Paul Ekberg, Cynthia Gao, Daniel Edward Licht, Jean Maillard, Alexandre Mourachko, Christophe Ropers, Safiyyah Saleem, Eduardo Sánchez, Ioannis Tsiamas, Arina Turkatenko, Albert Ventayol-Boada, Shireen Yates
EMNLP12
2025 Transferable Black-Box One-Shot Forging of Watermarks via Image Preference Models
abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in interest in digital content watermarking techniques, driven by the proliferation of generative models and increased legal pressure. With an ever-growing percentage of AI-generated content available online, watermarking plays an increasingly important role in ensuring content authenticity and attribution at scale. There have been many works assessing the robustness of watermarking to removal attacks, yet, watermark forging, the scenario when a watermark is stolen from genuine content and applied to malicious content, remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate watermark forging in the context of widely used post-hoc image watermarking. Our contributions are as follows. First, we introduce a preference model to assess whether an image is watermarked. The model is trained using a ranking loss on purely procedurally generated images without any need for real watermarks. Second, we demonstrate the model's capability to remove and forge watermarks by optimizing the input image through backpropagation. This technique requires only a single watermarked image and works without knowledge of the watermarking model, making our attack much simpler and more practical than attacks introduced in related work. Third, we evaluate our proposed method on a variety of post-hoc image watermarking models, demonstrating that our approach can effectively forge watermarks, questioning the security of current watermarking approaches. Our code and further resources are publicly available.
Tomás Soucek, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Pierre Fernandez, Nikola Jovanovic 0001, Hady ElSahar, Valeriu Lacatusu, Alexandre Mourachko
NeurIPS8
2023 BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metric
abstract
Mingda Chen, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Pierre Andrews, Justine Kao, Alexandre Mourachko, Holger Schwenk, Marta R. Costa-jussà. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Mingda Chen, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Pierre Andrews, Justine Kao, Alexandre Mourachko, Holger Schwenk, Marta R. Costa-jussà
ACL (1)5