VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Keoni Mahelona
dblp:324/3377
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Language models and text generation · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
low-resource NLP |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computing education › broadening participation in computing
culturally responsive computing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
benchmark construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dataset construction · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous languageabstractInfluential and popular benchmarks in AI are largely irrelevant to developing NLP tools for low-resource, Indigenous languages. With the primary goal of measuring the performance of general-purpose AI systems, these benchmarks fail to give due consideration and care to individual language communities, especially low-resource languages. The datasets contain numerous grammatical and orthographic errors, poor pronunciation, limited vocabulary, and the content lacks cultural relevance to the language community. To overcome the issues with these benchmarks, we have created a dataset for te reo Māori (the Indigenous language of Aotearoa/New Zealand) to pursue NLP tools that are ‘fit-for-our-purpose’. This paper demonstrates how low-resourced, Indigenous languages can develop tailored, high-quality benchmarks that; i. Consider the impact of colonisation on their language; ii. Reflect the diversity of speakers in the language community; iii. Support the aspirations for the tools they are developing and their language revitalisation efforts. Suzanne Duncan, Gianna Leoni, Lee Steven, Keoni Mahelona, Peter-Lucas Jones |
NeurIPS | 4 |