Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeongwoo Jae

dblp:324/4779 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 25% Language models and text generation · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › pure-exploration bandit
active search
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization
0.612022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
routing problems
0.212022
Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation-guided beam search · 1.1rollout · 1.1active search · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization
abstract
Neural approaches for combinatorial optimization (CO) equip a learning mechanism to discover powerful heuristics for solving complex real-world problems. While neural approaches capable of high-quality solutions in a single shot are emerging, state-of-the-art approaches are often unable to take full advantage of the solving time available to them. In contrast, hand-crafted heuristics perform highly effective search well and exploit the computation time given to them, but contain heuristics that are difficult to adapt to a dataset being solved. With the goal of providing a powerful search procedure to neural CO approaches, we propose simulation-guided beam search (SGBS), which examines candidate solutions within a fixed-width tree search that both a neural net-learned policy and a simulation (rollout) identify as promising. We further hybridize SGBS with efficient active search (EAS), where SGBS enhances the quality of solutions backpropagated in EAS, and EAS improves the quality of the policy used in SGBS. We evaluate our methods on well-known CO benchmarks and show that SGBS significantly improves the quality of the solutions found under reasonable runtime assumptions.
Jinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jeongwoo Jae, André Hottung, Kevin Tierney, Youngjune Gwon
NeurIPS4