Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeongwoo Jae
dblp:324/4779
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 25% Language models and text generation · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › pure-exploration bandit
active search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
routing problems |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation-guided beam search · 1.1rollout · 1.1active search · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial OptimizationabstractNeural approaches for combinatorial optimization (CO) equip a learning mechanism to discover powerful heuristics for solving complex real-world problems. While neural approaches capable of high-quality solutions in a single shot are emerging, state-of-the-art approaches are often unable to take full advantage of the solving time available to them. In contrast, hand-crafted heuristics perform highly effective search well and exploit the computation time given to them, but contain heuristics that are difficult to adapt to a dataset being solved. With the goal of providing a powerful search procedure to neural CO approaches, we propose simulation-guided beam search (SGBS), which examines candidate solutions within a fixed-width tree search that both a neural net-learned policy and a simulation (rollout) identify as promising. We further hybridize SGBS with efficient active search (EAS), where SGBS enhances the quality of solutions backpropagated in EAS, and EAS improves the quality of the policy used in SGBS. We evaluate our methods on well-known CO benchmarks and show that SGBS significantly improves the quality of the solutions found under reasonable runtime assumptions. Jinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jeongwoo Jae, André Hottung, Kevin Tierney, Youngjune Gwon |
NeurIPS | 4 |