Yuepeng Yang

dblp:324/5235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9852-2637ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 21% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 12%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 66% Learning theory · 23% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
1.422024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Algorithms and data structures
ranking
0.812024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.812024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Algorithms and data structures › ranking
top-k ranking
0.812024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.712023
O(T-1 Convergence of Optimistic-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › markov games
zero-sum markov game
0.712023
O(T-1 Convergence of Optimistic-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games · ICLR 2023
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation
0.712023
Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery
low-rank matrix recovery
0.712023
Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery
matrix completion
0.712023
Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery › matrix completion
noisy matrix completion
0.712023
Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
stochastic games
0.712023
O(T-1 Convergence of Optimistic-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.212024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.212024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.212024
Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary · COLT 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.212023
O(T-1 Convergence of Optimistic-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted maximum likelihood estimation · 1.5semidefinite programming · 1.5matrix multiplicative weight update · 1.5optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader · 1.3no-regret learning · 1.3statistical analysis · 0.7convex relaxation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Top-K ranking with a monotone adversary
abstract
In this paper, we address the top-$K$ ranking problem with a monotone adversary. We consider the scenario where a comparison graph is randomly generated and the adversary is allowed to add arbitrary edges. The statistician’s goal is then to accurately identify the top-$K$ preferred items based on pairwise comparisons derived from this semi-random comparison graph. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a weighted maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) that achieves near-optimal sample complexity, up to a $\log^2(n)$ factor, where $n$ denotes the number of items under comparison. This is made possible through a combination of analytical and algorithmic innovations. On the analytical front, we provide a refined $\ell_\infty$ error analysis of the weighted MLE that is more explicit and tighter than existing analyses. It relates the $\ell_\infty$ error with the spectral properties of the weighted comparison graph. Motivated by this, our algorithmic innovation involves the development of an SDP-based approach to reweight the semi-random graph and meet specified spectral properties. Additionally, we propose a first-order method based on the Matrix Multiplicative Weight Update (MMWU) framework to solve the resulting SDP efficiently in nearly-linear time in the size of the semi-random comparison graph.
Yuepeng Yang, Antares Chen, Lorenzo Orecchia, Cong Ma 0001
COLT1
2023 O(T-1 Convergence of Optimistic-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games
Yuepeng Yang, Cong Ma 0001
ICLR1
2023 Optimal Tuning-Free Convex Relaxation for Noisy Matrix Completion
abstract
This paper is concerned with noisy matrix completion—the problem of recovering a low-rank matrix from partial and noisy entries. Under uniform sampling and incoherence assumptions, we prove that a tuning-free square-root matrix completion estimator (${\mathtt {square{-}root~ MC}}$) achieves optimal statistical performance for solving the noisy matrix completion problem. Similar to the square-root Lasso estimator in high-dimensional linear regression,${\mathtt {square{-}root~ MC}}$does not rely on the knowledge of the size of the noise. While solving${\mathtt {square{-}root~ MC}}$is a convex program, our statistical analysis of${\mathtt {square{-}root~ MC}}$hinges on its intimate connections to a nonconvex rank-constrained estimator.
Yuepeng Yang, Cong Ma 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1