Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fatima Albreiki
dblp:324/7946
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Vision and language · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Language models and text generation · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval |
1.3 | 2 | 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End? · AAAI 2026 FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputs · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End? · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End? · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
position bias |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End? · AAAI 2026 |
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
image-text retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End? · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › fine-grained alignment
fine-grained cross-modal alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputs · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputs · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon Medical Visual Question Answering · AAAI 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › biomedical natural language processing › medical question answering
medical visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon Medical Visual Question Answering · AAAI 2025 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
zero-shot retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputs · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 3.7positional encoding analysis · 2.0vision-language model · 1.7token aggregation · 1.7positional embedding extension · 1.7dynamic model selection · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Positional Bias in Multimodal Embedding Models: Do They Favor the Beginning, the Middle, or the End?abstractPositional bias—where models overemphasize certain positions regardless of content—has been shown to negatively impact model performance across various tasks. While recent research has extensively examined positional bias in text generation models, its presence and effects in representation models remain underexplored. Even less is known about such biases in multimodal models. In this work, we investigate positional bias in multimodal representation models, specifically in the context of image-text retrieval. We begin by distinguishing between context importance and positional bias, and then assess the presence and extent of positional bias across different models and datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that positional bias is prevalent in multimodal models, but manifests differently across modalities: text encoders tend to exhibit bias toward the beginning of the input, whereas image encoders show bias at both the beginning and end. Furthermore, we find that this bias arises from, or is amplified by, a combination of factors, including the positional encoding scheme, training loss, context importance, and the nature of using image-text pairs in multimodal training Kebin Wu, Fatima Albreiki |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Falcon Medical Visual Question AnsweringabstractVision-Language Models (VLMs) bridge the gap between visual and textual data, enabling multimodal tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA). Leveraging this capability, Medical VQA systems have the potential to transform clinical decision-making by allowing healthcare providers to query medical images—such as X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans—and receive rapid, informed responses, thereby speeding up diagnoses and treatment planning. In this work, we introduce Falcon Med-VQA, a generative VQA system meticulously designed to interpret visual and textual medical data and generate free-form answers to medical questions. By leveraging a vision language model and a dynamic model selection mechanism, Falcon Med-VQA ensures relevance and precision in its responses. The system is equipped with an intuitive user interface that displays top answers with Confidence Scores (CF), enhances explainability through medical terminology extraction, and offers attention map visualizations for improved interpretability. Our experiments demonstrate that Falcon Med-VQA achieves comparable performance against specialized models and outperforms recent generative approaches in a key benchmark. Ameera Ali Bawazir, Hassan Alshanqiti, Kebin Wu, Fatima Albreiki |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text InputsabstractAs a pioneering vision-language model, CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training) has achieved significant success across various domains and a wide range of downstream vision-language tasks. However, the text encoders in popular CLIP models are limited to processing only 77 text tokens, which constrains their ability to effectively handle longer, detail-rich captions. Additionally, CLIP models often struggle to effectively capture detailed visual and textual information, which hampers their performance on tasks that require fine-grained analysis. To address these limitations, we present a novel approach, FineLIP, that extends the capabilities of CLIP. FineLIP enhances cross-modal text-image mapping by incorporating Fine-grained alignment with Longer text input within the CLIP-style framework. FineLIP first extends the positional embeddings to handle longer text, followed by the dynamic aggregation of local image and text tokens. The aggregated results are then used to enforce fine-grained token-to-token cross-modal alignment. We validate our model on datasets with long, detailed captions across two tasks: zero-shot cross-modal retrieval and text-to-image generation. Quantitative and qualitative experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of FineLIP, outperforming existing state-of-the-art approaches. Furthermore, comprehensive ablation studies validate the benefits of key design elements within FineLIP. The code will be available at https://github.com/tiiuae/FineLIP. Mothilal Asokan, Kebin Wu, Fatima Albreiki |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2022 | On the Robustness of 3D Object DetectorsabstractIn recent years, significant progress has been achieved for 3D object detection on point clouds thanks to the advances in 3D data collection and deep learning techniques. Nevertheless, 3D scenes exhibit a lot of variations and are prone to sensor inaccuracies as well as information loss during pre-processing. Thus, it is crucial to design techniques that are robust against these variations. This requires a detailed analysis and understanding of the effect of such variations. This work aims to analyze and benchmark popular point-based 3D object detectors against several data corruptions. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate the robustness of point-based 3D object detectors. To this end, we design and evaluate corruptions that involve data addition, reduction, and alteration. We further study the robustness of different modules against local and global variations. Our experimental results reveal several intriguing findings. For instance, we show that methods that integrate Transformers at a patch or object level lead to increased robustness, compared to using Transformers at the point level. The code is available at https://github.com/sultanabughazal/robustness3d. Fatima Albreiki, Sultan Abughazal, Jean Lahoud, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal, Fahad Shahbaz Khan |
MMAsia | 1 |