Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Brunzema

dblp:324/8229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Training · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Training · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization
0.912025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization
0.912025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.912025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization
0.912025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
sequential quadratic programming
0.912025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization
0.312025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › conic optimization
second-order cone programming
0.312025
BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational bayesian last layer · 0.9thompson sampling · 0.9line search · 0.9gaussian process surrogate · 0.9gaussian process conditioning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Training
abstract
Gaussian Processes (GPs) are widely seen as the state-of-the-art surrogate models for Bayesian optimization (BO) due to their ability to model uncertainty and their performance on tasks where correlations are easily captured (such as those defined by Euclidean metrics) and their ability to be efficiently updated online. However, the performance of GPs depends on the choice of kernel, and kernel selection for complex correlation structures is often difficult or must be made bespoke. While Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are a promising direction for higher capacity surrogate models, they have so far seen limited use due to poor performance on some problem types. In this paper, we propose an approach which shows competitive performance on many problem types, including some that BNNs typically struggle with. We build on variational Bayesian last layers (VBLLs), and connect training of these models to exact conditioning in GPs. We exploit this connection to develop an efficient online training algorithm that interleaves conditioning and optimization. Our findings suggest that VBLL networks significantly outperform GPs and other BNN architectures on tasks with complex input correlations, and match the performance of well-tuned GPs on established benchmark tasks.
Paul Brunzema, Mikkel Jordahn, John Willes, Sebastian Trimpe, Jasper Snoek, James Harrison
ICLR1
2025 BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming
abstract
We introduce BayeSQP, a novel algorithm for general black-box optimization that merges the structure of sequential quadratic programming with concepts from Bayesian optimization. BayeSQP employs second-order Gaussian process surrogates for both the objective and constraints to jointly model the function values, gradients, and Hessian from only zero-order information. At each iteration, a local subproblem is constructed using the GP posterior estimates and solved to obtain a search direction. Crucially, the formulation of the subproblem explicitly incorporates uncertainty in both the function and derivative estimates, resulting in a tractable second-order cone program for high probability improvements under model uncertainty. A subsequent one-dimensional line search via constrained Thompson sampling selects the next evaluation point. Empirical results show that BayeSQP outperforms state-of-the-art methods in specific high-dimensional settings. Our algorithm offers a principled and flexible framework that bridges classical optimization techniques with modern approaches to black-box optimization.
Paul Brunzema, Sebastian Trimpe
NeurIPS1