Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Moosbrugger
dblp:325/0229
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-9111-2667ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
exploitation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint Analysis · WWW 2024 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
prototype pollution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint Analysis · WWW 2024 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint Analysis · WWW 2024 |
Program analysis
dynamic analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint Analysis · WWW 2024 |
Program analysis › static analysis
taint analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint Analysis · WWW 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic taint analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Unveiling the Invisible: Detection and Evaluation of Prototype Pollution Gadgets with Dynamic Taint AnalysisabstractPrototype-based languages like JavaScript are susceptible to prototype pollution vulnerabilities, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary properties into an object's prototype. The attacker can subsequently capitalize on the injected properties by executing otherwise benign pieces of code, so-called gadgets, that perform security-sensitive operations. The success of an attack largely depends on the presence of gadgets, leading to high-profile exploits such as privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution (ACE). Mikhail Shcherbakov, Paul Moosbrugger, Musard Balliu |
WWW | 2 |
| 2022 | Formalization of Intersection Traffic Rules in Temporal LogicabstractIntersections are difficult to navigate for both human drivers and autonomous vehicles because several diverse traffic rules must be considered. In addition, current traffic rules are ambiguous and cannot be applied directly by autonomous vehicles. Therefore, national traffic rules must be concretized and formalized so that they are machine-interpretable. We present formalized intersection traffic rules in temporal logic and use the German traffic regulations as a concrete example. Our formalization considers different types of intersections, i.e., signalized, traffic-sign-regulated, and unregulated intersections. We also define predicates and functions that can be easily reused for other national traffic laws. We evaluate our formalized traffic rules on recorded real-world scenarios and manually-created test scenarios. Our evaluation validates the formalization from different legal sources. Sebastian Maierhofer, Paul Moosbrugger, Matthias Althoff |
IV | 2 |