Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xuting Tang
dblp:325/1540
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Machine translation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explanation-based learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning by Interpreting · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning by Interpreting · IJCAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning by Interpreting · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
attention mechanism · 0.6SHAP · 0.6LIME · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning by InterpretingabstractThis paper introduces a novel way of enhancing NLP prediction accuracy by incorporating model interpretation insights. Conventional efforts often focus on balancing the trade-offs between accuracy and interpretability, for instance, sacrificing model performance to increase the explainability. Here, we take a unique approach and show that model interpretation can ultimately help improve NLP quality. Specifically, we employ our learned interpretability results using attention mechanisms, LIME, and SHAP to train our model. We demonstrate a significant increase in accuracy of up to +3.4 BLEU points on NMT and up to +4.8 points on GLUE tasks, verifying our hypothesis that it is possible to achieve better model learning by incorporating model interpretation knowledge. Xuting Tang, Abdul Rafae Khan, Shusen Wang, Jia Xu 0004 |
IJCAI | 1 |