Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ninglin Ouyang

dblp:325/9755 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7402-7861ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
debiasing visual question answering
0.612022
Suppressing Biased Samples for Robust VQA · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.612022
Suppressing Biased Samples for Robust VQA · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.212022
Suppressing Biased Samples for Robust VQA · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.212022
Suppressing Biased Samples for Robust VQA · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic similarity · 0.6data classifier module · 0.6bias penalty module · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Suppressing Biased Samples for Robust VQA
abstract
Most existing visual question answering (VQA) models strongly rely on language bias to answer questions, i.e., they always tend to fit question-answer pairs on the train split and perform poorly on the test spilt when the answer distributions are different. This behavior makes them hard to be applied in real scenarios. To reduce the language biases, previous studies mainly integrate modules to overcome language priors (ensemble-based methods) or generate additional training data to balance dataset biases (data-balanced methods). However, all the existing ensemble-based methods drop their accuracies on the VQA v2 dataset, while data-balanced methods may introduce new biases and cannot guarantee the quality of the generated data. In this paper, we propose a model-agnostic training scheme called Suppressing Biased Samples (SBS) to overcome language priors. SBS consists of two collaborative parts, i.e., a Data Classifier Module to divide the dataset into biased samples and unbiased samples by utilizing the similarity in the semantic space, and a Bias Penalty Module to suppress the biased samples to weaken their influence. As a new way of balancing data to address language bias, SBS overcomes the shortcomings of previous data-balanced methods. Experimental results show that our method can be merged into other bias-reduction methods and achieves a new state-of-the-art performance on the commonly used VQA-CP v2 dataset.
Ninglin Ouyang, Qingbao Huang, Pijian Li, Yi Cai 0001, Bin Liu 0053, Ho-fung Leung, Qing Li 0001
IEEE Trans. Multim.1