Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liri Fang
dblp:326/3711
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0237-3367ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 67% Graph learning · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph metric learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs · KDD 2022 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › graph learning
graph classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
meta-learning · 1.1graph metric learning · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ClimateBench-M: A Multi-Modal Climate Data Benchmark with a Simple Generative MethodabstractClimate science studies the structure and dynamics of Earth's climate system and seeks to understand how climate changes over time, where the data is usually stored in the format of time series, recording the climate features, geolocation, time attributes, etc. Recently, much research attention has been paid to the climate benchmarks. In addition to the most common task of weather forecasting, several pioneering benchmark works are proposed for extending the modality, such as domain-specific applications like tropical cyclone intensity prediction and flash flood damage estimation, or climate statement and confidence level in the format of natural language. To further motivate the artificial intelligence development for climate science, in this paper, we first contribute a multi-modal climate benchmark, i.e., ClimateBench-M, which aligns (1) the time series climate data from ERA5, (2) extreme weather events data from NOAA, and (3) satellite image data from NASA HLS based on a unified spatial-temporal granularity. Second, under each data modality, we also propose a simple but strong generative method that could produce competitive performance in weather forecasting, thunderstorm alerts, and crop segmentation tasks in the proposed ClimateBench-M. The data and code of ClimateBench-M are publicly available at https://github.com/iDEA-iSAIL-Lab-UIUC/ClimateBench-M. Dongqi Fu, Yada Zhu, Zhining Liu 0002, Lecheng Zheng, Xiao Lin 0016, Zihao Li 0006, Liri Fang, Katherine Tieu, Onkar Bhardwaj, Komminist Weldemariam, Hanghang Tong, Hendrik F. Hamann, Jingrui He |
CIKM | 7 |
| 2025 | TSLA: A Multi-Task Time Series Language ModelabstractReal-world time series data often require analysis or interpretation from domain experts. Some tasks, like time series question answering, involve both time series and natural language questions, posing challenges for single-modality language models to understand their interaction. To this end, we present TSLA (Time Series Language Model), a framework designed to enhance the language model with the understanding of time series data for multi-modality tasks. TSLA comprises three key components. (1) Time Series Tokenizer learns how to represent time series data into discrete tokens, making it more manageable for language models. (2) Joint (Pre-)Training on task-agnostic time series and text data integrates time series tokens and text tokens to model the interplay between time series and language concepts. (3) Multi-task Instruction Tuning fine-tunes the pretrained TSLA for various downstream tasks relevant to user interests. For evaluation, we applied TSLA to time series data from human motions on four tasks: time series captioning, time series question answering, text-based time series synthesis, and text-based time series continuation. The results demonstrate TSLA’s effectiveness in handling multiple time series analysis tasks, pointing the way for future research endeavors. Liri Fang, Yuncong Chen, Wenchao Yu, Yanchi Liu, Lu-An Tang, Vetle I. Torvik |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2022 | Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal GraphsabstractGraph metric learning methods aim to learn the distance metric over graphs such that similar (e.g., same class) graphs are closer and dissimilar (e.g., different class) graphs are farther apart. This is of critical importance in many graph classification applications such as drug discovery and epidemics categorization. Most, if not all, graph metric learning techniques consider the input graph as static, and largely ignore the intrinsic dynamics of temporal graphs. However, in practice, a graph typically has heterogeneous dynamics (e.g., microscopic and macroscopic evolution patterns). As such, labeling a temporal graph is usually expensive and also requires background knowledge. To learn a good metric over temporal graphs, we propose a temporal graph metric learning framework, Temp-GFSM. With only a few labeled temporal graphs, Temp-GFSM outputs a good metric that can accurately classify different temporal graphs and be adapted to discover new subspaces for unseen classes. Each proposed component in Temp-GFSM answers the following questions: What patterns are evolving in a temporal graph? How to weigh these patterns to represent the characteristics of different temporal classes? And how to learn the metric with the guidance from only a few labels? Finally, the experimental results on real-world temporal graph classification tasks from various domains show the effectiveness of our Temp-GFSM. Dongqi Fu, Liri Fang, Ross Maciejewski, Vetle I. Torvik, Jingrui He |
KDD | 2 |