Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Georgios Karakasidis

dblp:326/6164 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2349-4854ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 91% Language models and text generation · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speaker recognition
0.812024
Open-Source Conversational AI with SpeechBrain 1.0 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech enhancement
0.812024
Open-Source Conversational AI with SpeechBrain 1.0 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model integration
0.212024
Open-Source Conversational AI with SpeechBrain 1.0 · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pytorch · 0.8decoding strategies · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Open-Source Conversational AI with SpeechBrain 1.0
abstract
SpeechBrain is an open-source Conversational AI toolkit based on PyTorch, focused particularly on speech processing tasks such as speech recognition, speech enhancement, speaker recognition, text-to-speech, and much more. It promotes transparency and replicability by releasing both the pre-trained models and the complete recipes of code and algorithms required for training them. This paper presents SpeechBrain 1.0, a significant milestone in the evolution of the toolkit, which now has over 200 recipes for speech, audio, and language processing tasks, and more than 100 models available on Hugging Face. SpeechBrain 1.0 introduces new technologies to support diverse learning modalities, Large Language Model (LLM) integration, and advanced decoding strategies, along with novel models, tasks, and modalities. It also includes a new benchmark repository, offering researchers a unified platform for evaluating models across diverse tasks.
Mirco Ravanelli, Titouan Parcollet, Adel Moumen, Sylvain de Langen, Cem Subakan, Peter Plantinga, Yingzhi Wang 0002, Pooneh Mousavi, Luca Della Libera, Artem Ploujnikov, Francesco Paissan, Davide Borra, Mohamed Salah Zaïem, Zeyu Zhao 0004, Shucong Zhang, Georgios Karakasidis, Sung-Lin Yeh, Pierre Champion, Aku Rouhe, Rudolf Braun, Florian Mai, Juan Zuluaga-Gomez, Seyed Mahed Mousavi, Andreas Nautsch, Xuechen Liu 0001, Sangeet Sagar, Jarod Duret, Salima Mdhaffar, Gaëlle Laperrière, Mickael Rouvier, Renato De Mori, Yannick Estève
J. Mach. Learn. Res.16
2024 Explainable empirical risk minimization
abstract
Abstract The successful application of machine learning (ML) methods increasingly depends on their interpretability or explainability. Designing explainable ML (XML) systems is instrumental for ensuring transparency of automated decision-making that targets humans. The explainability of ML methods is also an essential ingredient for trustworthy artificial intelligence. A key challenge in ensuring explainability is its dependence on the specific human end user of an ML system. The users of ML methods might have vastly different background knowledge about ML principles, with some having formal training in the specific field and others having none. We use information-theoretic concepts to develop a novel measure for the subjective explainability of predictions delivered by a ML method. We construct this measure via the conditional entropy of predictions, given the user signal. Our approach allows for a wide range of user signals, ranging from responses to surveys to biophysical measurements. We use this measure of subjective explainability as a regularizer for model training. The resulting explainable empirical risk minimization (EERM) principle strives to balance subjective explainability and risk. The EERM principle is flexible and can be combined with arbitrary ML models. We present several practical implementations of EERM for linear models and decision trees. Numerical experiments demonstrate the application of EERM to weather prediction and detecting inappropriate language in social media.
Georgios Karakasidis, Arina Odnoblyudova, Leyla Dogruel, Alexander Jung 0001
Neural Comput. Appl.2
2024 Comparison and analysis of new curriculum criteria for end-to-end ASR
abstract
Traditionally, teaching a human and a Machine Learning (ML) model is quite different, but organized and structured learning has the ability to enable faster and better understanding of the underlying concepts. For example, when humans learn to speak, they first learn how to utter basic phones and then slowly move towards more complex structures such as words and sentences. Motivated by this observation, researchers have started to adapt this approach for training ML models. Since the main concept, the gradual increase in difficulty, resembles the notion of the curriculum in education, the methodology became known as Curriculum Learning (CL). In this work, we design and test new CL approaches to train Automatic Speech Recognition systems, specifically focusing on the so-called end-to-end models. These models consist of a single, large-scale neural network that performs the recognition task, in contrast to the traditional way of having several specialized components focusing on different subtasks (e.g., acoustic and language modeling). We demonstrate that end-to-end models can achieve better performances if they are provided with an organized training set consisting of examples that exhibit an increasing level of difficulty. To impose structure on the training set and to define the notion of an easy example, we explored multiple solutions that use either external, static scoring methods or incorporate feedback from the model itself. In addition, we examined the effect of pacing functions that control how much data is presented to the network during each training epoch. Our proposed curriculum learning strategies were tested on the task of speech recognition on two data sets, one containing spontaneous Finnish speech where volunteers were asked to speak about a given topic, and one containing planned English speech. Empirical results showed that a good curriculum strategy can yield performance improvements and speed-up convergence. After a given number of epochs, our best strategy achieved a 5.6% and 3.4% decrease in terms of test set word error rate for the Finnish and English data sets, respectively.
Georgios Karakasidis, Mikko Kurimo, Peter Bell 0001, Tamás Grósz
Speech Commun.1
2022 Comparison and Analysis of New Curriculum Criteria for End-to-End ASR
abstract
The computational resources were provided by Aalto ScienceIT. We are grateful for the Academy of Finland project funding number 345790 in ICT 2023 programme's project”Understanding speech and scene with ears and eyes”
Georgios Karakasidis, Tamás Grósz, Mikko Kurimo
INTERSPEECH1