Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hae Beom Lee

dblp:326/7260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
extrapolation
0.912025
Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted Networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.912025
Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
multi-fidelity bayesian optimization
0.912025
Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted Networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference
0.812024
Delta-AI: Local objectives for amortized inference in sparse graphical models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.812024
Delta-AI: Local objectives for amortized inference in sparse graphical models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.312025
Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
prior-data fitted networks
0.312025
Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted Networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks
0.212024
Delta-AI: Local objectives for amortized inference in sparse graphical models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
covariance estimation
0.212022
Meta Learning Low Rank Covariance Factors for Energy Based Deterministic Uncertainty · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 1.4transfer learning · 0.9surrogate modeling · 0.9prior-data fitted networks · 0.9bayesian active learning · 0.9acquisition function design · 0.9off-policy training · 0.8local credit assignment · 0.8low-rank covariance · 0.6energy-based model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted Networks
abstract
Scaling has been a major driver of recent advancements in deep learning. Numerous empirical studies have found that scaling laws often follow the power-law and proposed several variants of power-law functions to predict the scaling behavior at larger scales. However, existing methods mostly rely on point estimation and do not quantify uncertainty, which is crucial for real-world applications involving decision-making problems such as determining the expected performance improvements achievable by investing additional computational resources. In this work, we explore a Bayesian framework based on Prior-data Fitted Networks (PFNs) for neural scaling law extrapolation. Specifically, we design a prior distribution that enables the sampling of infinitely many synthetic functions resembling real-world neural scaling laws, allowing our PFN to meta-learn the extrapolation. We validate the effectiveness of our approach on real-world neural scaling laws, comparing it against both the existing point estimation methods and Bayesian approaches. Our method demonstrates superior performance, particularly in data-limited scenarios such as Bayesian active learning, underscoring its potential for reliable, uncertainty-aware extrapolation in practical applications.
Dong Bok Lee, Steven Adriaensen, Sung Ju Hwang, Frank Hutter, Seon Joo Kim, Hae Beom Lee
ICML8
2025 Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of cost-sensitive hyperparameter optimization (HPO) built upon freeze-thaw Bayesian optimization (BO). Specifically, we assume a scenario where users want to early-stop the HPO process when the expected performance improvement is not satisfactory with respect to the additional computational cost. Motivated by this scenario, we introduce \emph{utility} in the freeze-thaw framework, a function describing the trade-off between the cost and performance that can be estimated from the user's preference data. This utility function, combined with our novel acquisition function and stopping criterion, allows us to dynamically continue training the configuration that we expect to maximally improve the utility in the future, and also automatically stop the HPO process around the maximum utility. Further, we improve the sample efficiency of existing freeze-thaw methods with transfer learning to develop a specialized surrogate model for the cost-sensitive HPO problem. We validate our algorithm on established multi-fidelity HPO benchmarks and show that it outperforms all the previous freeze-thaw BO and transfer-BO baselines we consider, while achieving a significantly better trade-off between the cost and performance.
Dong Bok Lee, Aoxuan Silvia Zhang, Byungjoo Kim, Junhyeon Park, Steven Adriaensen, Juho Lee 0001, Sung Ju Hwang, Hae Beom Lee
NeurIPS8
2024 Delta-AI: Local objectives for amortized inference in sparse graphical models
abstract
We present a new algorithm for amortized inference in sparse probabilistic graphical models (PGMs), which we call $\Delta$-amortized inference ($\Delta$-AI). Our approach is based on the observation that when the sampling of variables in a PGM is seen as a sequence of actions taken by an agent, sparsity of the PGM enables local credit assignment in the agent's policy learning objective. This yields a local constraint that can be turned into a local loss in the style of generative flow networks (GFlowNets) that enables off-policy training but avoids the need to instantiate all the random variables for each parameter update, thus speeding up training considerably. The $\Delta$-AI objective matches the conditional distribution of a variable given its Markov blanket in a tractable learned sampler, which has the structure of a Bayesian network, with the same conditional distribution under the target PGM. As such, the trained sampler recovers marginals and conditional distributions of interest and enables inference of partial subsets of variables. We illustrate $\Delta$-AI's effectiveness for sampling from synthetic PGMs and training latent variable models with sparse factor structure. Code: https://github.com/GFNOrg/Delta-AI.
Jean-Pierre R. Falet, Hae Beom Lee, Nikolay Malkin, Chen Sun 0007, Dragos Secrieru, Dinghuai Zhang, Guillaume Lajoie, Yoshua Bengio
ICLR2
2022 Meta Learning Low Rank Covariance Factors for Energy Based Deterministic Uncertainty
Jeffrey Willette, Hae Beom Lee, Juho Lee 0001, Sung Ju Hwang
ICLR2