Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Lemke

dblp:327/1837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 88% Medical and health informatics · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
brain connectivity analysis
0.712023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.712023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023
Information theory › information measures › multiterminal information measures
directed information
0.712023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023
Information theory › network information theory
information flow
0.712023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
EEG/MEG analysis
0.212023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural signal analysis
0.212023
An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wiener-granger causality · 1.3information-theoretic measures · 0.7information-theoretic measure · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 An information-theoretic quantification of the content of communication between brain regions
abstract
Quantifying the amount, content and direction of communication between brain regions is key to understanding brain function. Traditional methods to analyze brain activity based on the Wiener-Granger causality principle quantify the overall information propagated by neural activity between simultaneously recorded brain regions, but do not reveal the information flow about specific features of interest (such as sensory stimuli). Here, we develop a new information theoretic measure termed Feature-specific Information Transfer (FIT), quantifying how much information about a specific feature flows between two regions. FIT merges the Wiener-Granger causality principle with information-content specificity. We first derive FIT and prove analytically its key properties. We then illustrate and test them with simulations of neural activity, demonstrating that FIT identifies, within the total information propagated between regions, the information that is transmitted about specific features. We then analyze three neural datasets obtained with different recording methods, magneto- and electro-encephalography, and spiking activity, to demonstrate the ability of FIT to uncover the content and direction of information flow between brain regions beyond what can be discerned with traditional analytical methods. FIT can improve our understanding of how brain regions communicate by uncovering previously unaddressed feature-specific information flow.
Marco Celotto, Jan Bím, Alejandro Tlaie, Vito De Feo, Alessandro Toso, Stefan Lemke, Daniel Chicharro, Hamed Nili, Malte Bieler, Ileana L. Hanganu-Opatz, Tobias Donner, Andrea Brovelli, Stefano Panzeri
NeurIPS6