VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vasily Tesalin
dblp:327/3287
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 75% Image and video processing · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging › color constancy
automatic white balance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Image and video processing › color image processing
color correction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging
illumination estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging › color constancy
white balance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 1.3neural network · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimationabstractA camera’s auto-white-balance (AWB) module operates under the assumption that there is a single dominant illumination in a captured scene. AWB methods estimate an image’s dominant illumination and use it as the target "white point" for correction. However, in natural scenes, there are often many light sources present. We performed a user study that revealed that non-dominant illuminations often produce visually pleasing white-balanced images and, in some cases, are even preferred over the dominant illumination. Motivated by this observation, we revisit AWB to predict a distribution of plausible illuminations for use in white balance. As part of this effort, we extend the Cube+ + illumination estimation dataset [12] to provide ground truth illumination distributions per image. Using this new ground truth data, we describe how to train a lightweight neural network method to predict the scene’s illumination distribution. We describe how our idea can be used with existing image formats by embedding the estimated distribution in the RAW image to enable users to generate visually plausible white-balance images. Egor I. Ershov, Vasily Tesalin, Ivan Ermakov, Michael S. Brown |
ICCV | 2 |