Henrik Schopmans

dblp:327/3756 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 94% Efficient and distributed learning · 6%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.622025
Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators · ICML 2025
Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
boltzmann distribution sampling
1.622025
Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators · ICML 2025
Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular simulation
1.622025
Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators · ICML 2025
Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
boltzmann generator
0.912025
Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
conditional normalizing flow
0.812024
Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.212024
Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temperature annealing · 1.7reweighting · 1.7reverse kullback-leibler divergence · 1.7normalizing flow · 1.5active learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators
abstract
Efficient sampling of unnormalized probability densities such as the Boltzmann distribution of molecular systems is a longstanding challenge. Next to conventional approaches like molecular dynamics or Markov chain Monte Carlo, variational approaches, such as training normalizing flows with the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence, have been introduced. However, such methods are prone to mode collapse and often do not learn to sample the full configurational space. Here, we present temperature-annealed Boltzmann generators (TA-BG) to address this challenge. First, we demonstrate that training a normalizing flow with the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence at high temperatures is possible without mode collapse. Furthermore, we introduce a reweighting-based training objective to anneal the distribution to lower target temperatures. We apply this methodology to three molecular systems of increasing complexity and, compared to the baseline, achieve better results in almost all metrics while requiring up to three times fewer target energy evaluations. For the largest system, our approach is the only method that accurately resolves the metastable states of the system.
Henrik Schopmans, Pascal Friederich
ICML1
2024 Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations
abstract
Efficient sampling of the Boltzmann distribution of molecular systems is a long-standing challenge. Recently, instead of generating long molecular dynamics simulations, generative machine learning methods such as normalizing flows have been used to learn the Boltzmann distribution directly, without samples. However, this approach is susceptible to mode collapse and thus often does not explore the full configurational space. In this work, we address this challenge by separating the problem into two levels, the fine-grained and coarse-grained degrees of freedom. A normalizing flow conditioned on the coarse-grained space yields a probabilistic connection between the two levels. To explore the configurational space, we employ coarse-grained simulations with active learning which allows us to update the flow and make all-atom potential energy evaluations only when necessary. Using alanine dipeptide as an example, we show that our methods obtain a speedup to molecular dynamics simulations of approximately $15.9$ to $216.2$ compared to the speedup of $4.5$ of the current state-of-the-art machine learning approach.
Henrik Schopmans, Pascal Friederich
ICML1