Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Barath Mohan Umapathi

dblp:327/9232 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0180-5439ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 60% Time series and sequential data · 40%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
1.222023
Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023
Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.712023
Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
likelihood-based outlier detection
0.712023
Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods · CVPR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 0.7generative flow · 0.7bijective transformations · 0.7PixelCNN++ · 0.7likelihood bias correction · 0.6contrast stretching · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++
abstract
Reliable outlier detection is critical for real-world deployment of deep learning models. Although extensively studied, likelihoods produced by deep generative models have been largely dismissed as being impractical for outlier detection. First, deep generative model likelihoods are readily biased by low-level input statistics. Second, many recent solutions for correcting these biases are computationally expensive, or do not generalize well to complex, natural datasets. Here, we explore outlier detection with a state-of-the-art deep autoregressive model: PixelCNN++. We show that biases in PixelCNN++ likelihoods arise primarily from predictions based on local dependencies. We propose two families of bijective transformations -- ``stirring'' and ``shaking'' -- which ameliorate low-level biases and isolate the contribution of long-range dependencies to PixelCNN++ likelihoods. These transformations are inexpensive and readily computed at evaluation time. We test our approaches extensively with five grayscale and six natural image datasets and show that they achieve or exceed state-of-the-art outlier detection, particularly on datasets with complex, natural images. We also show that our solutions work well with other types of generative models (generative flows and variational autoencoders) and that their efficacy is governed by each model's reliance on local dependencies. In sum, lightweight remedies suffice to achieve robust outlier detection on image data with deep generative models.
Barath Mohan Umapathi, Kushal Chauhan, Pradeep Shenoy, D. Sridharan 0002
IJCAI1
2022 Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods
abstract
Deep networks often make confident, yet, incorrect, predictions when tested with outlier data that is far removed from their training distributions. Likelihoods computed by deep generative models (DGMs) are a candidate metric for outlier detection with unlabeled data. Yet, previous studies have shown that DGM likelihoods are unreliable and can be easily biased by simple transformations to input data. Here, we examine outlier detection with variational autoencoders (VAEs), among the simplest of DGMs. We propose novel analytical and algorithmic approaches to ameliorate key biases with VAE likelihoods. Our bias corrections are sample-specific, computationally inexpensive, and readily computed for various decoder visible distributions. Next, we show that a well-known image pre-processing technique – contrast stretching – extends the effectiveness of bias correction to further improve outlier detection. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracies with nine grayscale and natural image datasets, and demonstrates significant advantages – both with speed and performance – over four recent, competing approaches. In summary, lightweight remedies suffice to achieve robust outlier detection with VAEs.11Code is available at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/vae_ood.
Kushal Chauhan, Barath Mohan Umapathi, Pradeep Shenoy, D. Sridharan 0002
CVPR2