Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Barath Mohan Umapathi
dblp:327/9232
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0180-5439ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 60% Time series and sequential data · 40% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023 Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
likelihood-based outlier detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++ · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.7generative flow · 0.7bijective transformations · 0.7PixelCNN++ · 0.7likelihood bias correction · 0.6contrast stretching · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Shaken, and Stirred: Long-Range Dependencies Enable Robust Outlier Detection with PixelCNN++abstractReliable outlier detection is critical for real-world deployment of deep learning models. Although extensively studied, likelihoods produced by deep generative models have been largely dismissed as being impractical for outlier detection. First, deep generative model likelihoods are readily biased by low-level input statistics. Second, many recent solutions for correcting these biases are computationally expensive, or do not generalize well to complex, natural datasets. Here, we explore outlier detection with a state-of-the-art deep autoregressive model: PixelCNN++. We show that biases in PixelCNN++ likelihoods arise primarily from predictions based on local dependencies. We propose two families of bijective transformations -- ``stirring'' and ``shaking'' -- which ameliorate low-level biases and isolate the contribution of long-range dependencies to PixelCNN++ likelihoods. These transformations are inexpensive and readily computed at evaluation time. We test our approaches extensively with five grayscale and six natural image datasets and show that they achieve or exceed state-of-the-art outlier detection, particularly on datasets with complex, natural images. We also show that our solutions work well with other types of generative models (generative flows and variational autoencoders) and that their efficacy is governed by each model's reliance on local dependencies. In sum, lightweight remedies suffice to achieve robust outlier detection on image data with deep generative models. Barath Mohan Umapathi, Kushal Chauhan, Pradeep Shenoy, D. Sridharan 0002 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoodsabstractDeep networks often make confident, yet, incorrect, predictions when tested with outlier data that is far removed from their training distributions. Likelihoods computed by deep generative models (DGMs) are a candidate metric for outlier detection with unlabeled data. Yet, previous studies have shown that DGM likelihoods are unreliable and can be easily biased by simple transformations to input data. Here, we examine outlier detection with variational autoencoders (VAEs), among the simplest of DGMs. We propose novel analytical and algorithmic approaches to ameliorate key biases with VAE likelihoods. Our bias corrections are sample-specific, computationally inexpensive, and readily computed for various decoder visible distributions. Next, we show that a well-known image pre-processing technique – contrast stretching – extends the effectiveness of bias correction to further improve outlier detection. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracies with nine grayscale and natural image datasets, and demonstrates significant advantages – both with speed and performance – over four recent, competing approaches. In summary, lightweight remedies suffice to achieve robust outlier detection with VAEs.11Code is available at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/vae_ood. Kushal Chauhan, Barath Mohan Umapathi, Pradeep Shenoy, D. Sridharan 0002 |
CVPR | 2 |