Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alvaro Carbonero

dblp:328/4533 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
benchmark dataset
0.912025
PF∆: A Benchmark Dataset for Power Flow under Load, Generation, and Topology Variations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312025
PF∆: A Benchmark Dataset for Power Flow under Load, Generation, and Topology Variations · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PF∆: A Benchmark Dataset for Power Flow under Load, Generation, and Topology Variations
abstract
Power flow (PF) calculations are the backbone of real-time grid operations, across workflows such as contingency analysis (where repeated PF evaluations assess grid security under outages) and topology optimization (which involves PF-based searches over combinatorially large action spaces). Running these calculations at operational timescales or across large evaluation spaces remains a major computational bottleneck. Additionally, growing uncertainty in power system operations from the integration of renewables and climate-induced extreme weather also calls for tools that can accurately and efficiently simulate a wide range of scenarios and operating conditions. Machine learning methods offer a potential speedup over traditional solvers, but their performance has not been systematically assessed on benchmarks that capture real-world variability. This paper introduces PF∆, a benchmark dataset for power flow that captures diverse variations in load, generation, and topology. PF∆ contains 859,800 solved power flow instances spanning six different bus system sizes, capturing three types of contingency scenarios (N , N –1, and N –2), and including close-to-infeasible cases near steady-state voltage stability limits. We evaluate traditional solvers and GNN-based methods, highlighting key areas where existing approaches struggle, and identifying open problems for future research. Our dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/pfdelta/pfdelta/tree/main and our code with data generation scripts and model implementations is at https: //github.com/MOSSLab-MIT/pfdelta
Ana Rivera Him, Anvita Bhagavathula, Alvaro Carbonero, Priya L. Donti
NeurIPS3