Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saja A. Fakhraldeen

dblp:328/8506 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3919-0270ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
fitness prediction
0.612022
Predicting and explaining the impact of genetic disruptions and interactions on organismal viability · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
genetic interaction prediction
0.612022
Predicting and explaining the impact of genetic disruptions and interactions on organismal viability · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multinomial regression · 0.6interpretable machine learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Predicting and explaining the impact of genetic disruptions and interactions on organismal viability
abstract
MOTIVATION: Existing computational models can predict single- and double-mutant fitness but they do have limitations. First, they are often tested via evaluation metrics that are inappropriate for imbalanced datasets. Second, all of them only predict a binary outcome (viable or not, and negatively interacting or not). Third, most are uninterpretable black box machine learning models. RESULTS: Budding yeast datasets were used to develop high-performance Multinomial Regression (MN) models capable of predicting the impact of single, double and triple genetic disruptions on viability. These models are interpretable and give realistic non-binary predictions and can predict negative genetic interactions (GIs) in triple-gene knockouts. They are based on a limited set of gene features and their predictions are influenced by the probability of target gene participating in molecular complexes or pathways. Furthermore, the MN models have utility in other organisms such as fission yeast, fruit flies and humans, with the single gene fitness MN model being able to distinguish essential genes necessary for cell-autonomous viability from those required for multicellular survival. Finally, our models exceed the performance of previous models, without sacrificing interpretability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code and processed datasets used to generate results and figures in this manuscript are available at our Github repository at https://github.com/KISRDevelopment/cell_viability_paper. The repository also contains a link to the GI prediction website that lets users search for GIs using the MN models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bader F. Al-Anzi, Mohammad Khajah, Saja A. Fakhraldeen
Bioinform.3