Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaxia He
dblp:329/0394
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1517-6055ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 39% Graph learning · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
cross-modal representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MFC: Mixed Federated Clustering based on Cross-modal Feature Decoupling · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › unsupervised federated learning
federated clustering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MFC: Mixed Federated Clustering based on Cross-modal Feature Decoupling · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MFC: Mixed Federated Clustering based on Cross-modal Feature Decoupling · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
heterogeneous graph matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mixed-Modality Clustering via Generative Graph Structure Matching · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
multi-modal clustering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mixed-Modality Clustering via Generative Graph Structure Matching · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature decoupling · 1.0contrastive clustering · 1.0bipartite graph · 0.8bidirectional mapping · 0.8adaptive graph matching · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MFC: Mixed Federated Clustering based on Cross-modal Feature DecouplingabstractExisting federated clustering methods typically assume that either all clients supply the same type of single-modal/multi-modal data, or that different clients provide various modalities describing the same object. However, a prevalent real-world scenario involves clients contributing data from diverse and unrelated modalities. Addressing the challenge of uncovering clustering patterns from such heterogeneous modality data distributed across distinct clients is crucial. In this paper, we propose a novel cross-modal feature decoupling-based mixed federated clustering model. To address client heterogeneity, we introduce a cross-modal feature decoupling module for each client, designed to decouple modality-agnostic and modality-specific features through distinct encoders.Only the modality-agnostic encoder parameters and clustering centers of each client are transmitted to the server. This enables the server to aggregate various modality-agnostic encoders, effectively discovering the global clustering structure while avoiding interference from modality-specific noise. Moreover, we develop a global consistent complementary clustering module to integrate the complementary clustering centers from various clients. The global clustering centers are then dispatched back to clients to guide and calibrate their local clustering models. Experimental results on three public datasets show the superiority of the proposed model compared to classic federated clustering methods. Xiaxia He, Boyue Wang, Junbin Gao, Yongli Hu |
KDD (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-view subspace clustering with incomplete graph informationabstractAbstract The core of multi‐view clustering is how to exploit the shared and specific information of multi‐view data properly. The data missing and incompleteness bring great challenges to multi‐view clustering. In this paper, we propose an innovative multi‐view subspace clustering method with incomplete graph information, so‐called incomplete multiple graphs clustering. Specifically, we creatively separate one shared and multiple specific graphs from multiple raw graph data, and exploit the mask fusion strategy and block diagonal regulariser to obtain the inherent category information. To handle the incomplete multiple graph data, we utilise multiple indicator matrices to mark the missing elements existed in each raw graph. In addition, the weight of each raw graph is adaptively learnt according to the graph importance. The alternative direction optimization algorithm is employed to solve our proposed methods. Finally, we also analyse the algorithm convergence and the computation complexity in detail. The clustering results on six real‐world datasets show that our method obviously outperforms a serious of classic incomplete multi‐view clustering methods. Xiaxia He, Boyue Wang, Cuicui Luo, Junbin Gao, Yongli Hu |
IET Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2024 | Mixed-Modality Clustering via Generative Graph Structure MatchingabstractThe goal of mixed-modality clustering, which differs from typical multi-modality/view clustering, is to divide samples derived from various modalities into several clusters. This task has to solve two critical semantic gap problems: i) how to generate the missing modalities without the pairwise-modality data; and ii) how to align the representations of heterogeneous modalities. To tackle the above problems, this paper proposes a novel mixedmodality clustering model, which integrates the missing-modality generation and the heterogeneous modality alignment into a unified framework. During the missing-modality generation process, a bidirectional mapping is established between different modalities, enabling generation of preliminary representations for the missing-modality using information from another modality. Then the intra-modality bipartite graphs are constructed to help generate better missing-modality representations by weighted aggregating existing intra-modality neighbors. In this way, a pairwise-modality representation for each sample can be obtained. In the process of heterogeneous modality alignment, each modality is modelled as a graph to capture the global structure among intra-modality samples and is aligned against the heterogeneous modality representations through the adaptive heterogeneous graph matching module. Experimental results on three public datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed model compared to multiple state-of-the-art multi-modality/view clustering methods. Xiaxia He, Boyue Wang, Junbin Gao, Qianqian Wang 0001, Yongli Hu |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2024 | Parallelly Adaptive Graph Convolutional Clustering ModelabstractBenefiting from exploiting the data topological structure, graph convolutional network (GCN) has made considerable improvements in processing clustering tasks. The performance of GCN significantly relies on the quality of the pretrained graph, while the graph structures are often corrupted by noise or outliers. To overcome this problem, we replace the pre-trained and fixed graph in GCN by the adaptive graph learned from the data. In this article, we propose a novel end-to-end parallelly adaptive graph convolutional clustering (AGCC) model with two pathway networks. In the first pathway, an adaptive graph convolutional (AGC) module alternatively updates the graph structure and the data representation layer by layer. The updated graph can better reflect the data relationship than the fixed graph. In the second pathway, the auto-encoder (AE) module aims to extract the latent data features. To effectively connect the AGC and AE modules, we creatively propose an attention-mechanism-based fusion (AMF) module to weight and fuse the data representations of the two modules, and transfer them to the AGC module. This simultaneously avoids the over-smoothing problem of GCN. Experimental results on six public datasets show that the effectiveness of the proposed AGCC compared with multiple state-of-the-art deep clustering methods. The code is available at https://github.com/HeXiax/AGCC. Xiaxia He, Boyue Wang, Yongli Hu, Junbin Gao |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | Graph structure learning layer and its graph convolution clustering application
Xiaxia He, Boyue Wang, Ruikun Li 0001, Junbin Gao, Yongli Hu, Guangyu Huo |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2022 | Multi-graph convolutional clustering networkabstractAbstract The relationship between objects can be described from different angles. Although multiple kinds of relationships make the connections between objects complex, they bring in more discriminative information for the clustering tasks. Therefore, how to effectively fuse multiple kinds of relationships becomes a critical problem. In this paper, we propose a novel Multi‐graph Convolutional Clustering Network which deeply explores the feature information of nodes and fuses the multiple kinds of relationships between nodes. Unlike most graph convolutional clustering methods that only exploit the single graph or directly fuse multiple graphs into a unified graph before the graph convolution operation, we firstly build multiple parallelled graph convolution layers for each graph to learn diverse data representations, which fully exploits different statistics information between graphs. Then, a designed multi‐graph attention module fuses above data representations and considers the importance of each graph. Besides, the proposed model completes the transition from single graph to multiple graphs, which reduces the dependence of the quality of the single graph and enhances the robustness to graphs. Experimental results verify that the proposed multi‐graph convolution clustering performs better than the traditional single‐graph convolution clustering. Boyue Wang, Yifan Wang 0004, Xiaxia He, Yongli Hu |
IET Signal Process. | 3 |