Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huu-Tien Dang

dblp:329/4076 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-3578-7653ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
LLM unlearning
0.912025
On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning
0.912025
On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering
representation steering
0.912025
On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representation misdirection · 0.9adaptive steering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning
abstract
Representation Misdirection for Unlearning (RMU), which steers model representation in the intermediate layer to a target random representation, is an effective method for large language model (LLM) unlearning. Despite its high performance, the underlying cause and explanation remain underexplored. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate that steering forget representations in the intermediate layer reduces token confidence, causing LLMs to generate wrong or nonsense responses. We investigate how the coefficient influences the alignment of forget-sample representations with the random direction and hint at the optimal coefficient values for effective unlearning across different network layers. We show that RMU unlearned models are robust against adversarial jailbreak attacks. Furthermore, our empirical analysis shows that RMU is less effective when applied to the middle and later layers in LLMs. To resolve this drawback, we propose Adaptive RMU---a simple yet effective alternative method that makes unlearning effective with most layers. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Adaptive RMU significantly improves the unlearning performance compared to prior art while incurring no additional computational cost.
Huu-Tien Dang, Tin Pham, Hoang Thanh-Tung, Naoya Inoue
AAAI1