Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonas Mücke

dblp:329/4428 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1523-2069ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Network measurement and analytics · 51% Transport protocols and congestion control · 27% Internet of things and sensor networks · 18%
Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 69% Network security · 31%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control
QUIC
1.322024
ReACKed QUICer: Measuring the Performance of Instant Acknowledgments in QUIC Handshakes · IMC 2024
On the interplay between TLS certificates and QUIC performance · CoNEXT 2022
Internet of things and sensor networks › sensor data management
data integrity
0.912025
Lessons Learned from Operating a Large Network Telescope · SIGCOMM 2025
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
internet background radiation
0.912025
Lessons Learned from Operating a Large Network Telescope · SIGCOMM 2025
Network measurement and analytics
passive measurement
0.912025
Lessons Learned from Operating a Large Network Telescope · SIGCOMM 2025
Network measurement and analytics › network performance measurement
protocol performance measurement
0.812024
ReACKed QUICer: Measuring the Performance of Instant Acknowledgments in QUIC Handshakes · IMC 2024
Internet architecture and protocols › world wide web
web protocols
0.212022
On the interplay between TLS certificates and QUIC performance · CoNEXT 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

honeypot comparison · 1.7darknet monitoring · 1.7measurement study · 1.1numerical analysis · 0.8emulation · 0.8active measurement · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lessons Learned from Operating a Large Network Telescope
abstract
Network telescopes (aka darknets) collect unsolicited Internet traffic (aka Internet background radiation or IBR), which includes benign and malicious scanning as well as artifacts of spoofed denial-of-service attacks and misconfigured software and hosts. Analysis of this traffic has revealed macroscopic insights into security-related events and global network dynamics such as outages. Operating a large-scale network telescope is challenging but often taken for granted, more so than in more mature scientific disciplines. We offer the first study documenting our experiences operating the UCSD Network Telescope, the largest and longest-operating network telescope supporting scientific research. We provide background on the history of the telescope, and focus on increasing operational challenges as the underlying network evolves. We develop and apply techniques to leverage third-party scanning activity to validate the integrity of the data, and to discover misconfigurations in the instrumentation. These insights are crucial for understanding measurement results, which we illustrate using concrete examples. We discuss how our findings generalize to support the expanding ecosystem of other passive techniques, such as honeypots, to track security phenomena.
Alexander Männel 0002, Jonas Mücke, K. C. Claffy, Max Gao, Ricky K. P. Mok, Marcin Nawrocki, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
SIGCOMM2
2024 ReACKed QUICer: Measuring the Performance of Instant Acknowledgments in QUIC Handshakes
abstract
In this paper, we present a detailed performance analysis of QUIC instant~ACK, a standard-compliant approach to reduce waiting times during the QUIC connection setup in common CDN deployments. To understand the root causes of the performance properties, we combine numerical analysis and the emulation of eight QUIC implementations using the QUIC Interop Runner. Our experiments comprehensively cover packet loss and non-loss scenarios, different round trip times, and TLS certificate sizes. To clarify instant ACK deployments in the wild, we conduct active measurements of 1M~popular domain names. For almost all domain names under control of Cloudflare, Cloudflare uses instant ACK, which in fact improves performance. We also find, however, that instant ACK may lead to unnecessary retransmissions or longer waiting times under some network conditions, raising awareness of drawbacks of instant ACK in the future.
Jonas Mücke, Marcin Nawrocki, Raphael Hiesgen, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
IMC1
2022 On the interplay between TLS certificates and QUIC performance
abstract
In this paper, we revisit the performance of the QUIC connection setup and relate the design choices for fast and secure connections to common Web deployments. We analyze over 1M Web domains with 272k QUIC-enabled services and find two worrying results. First, current practices of creating, providing, and fetching Web certificates undermine reduced round trip times during the connection setup since sizes of 35% of server certificates exceed the amplification limit. Second, non-standard server implementations lead to larger amplification factors than QUIC permits, which increase even further in IP spoofing scenarios. We present guidance for all involved stakeholders to improve the situation.
Marcin Nawrocki, Pouyan Fotouhi Tehrani, Raphael Hiesgen, Jonas Mücke, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
CoNEXT4