Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuyou Gan
dblp:329/4494
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8814-3940ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Adversarial Transferability with Adversarial Weight Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Adversarial Transferability with Adversarial Weight Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Adversarial Transferability with Adversarial Weight Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
explanation robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature Attribution · CCS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature Attribution · CCS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature Attribution · CCS 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature Attribution · CCS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature attribution · 1.1adversarial perturbation · 1.1gradient-based attack · 0.9adversarial weight tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Enhancing Adversarial Transferability with Adversarial Weight TuningabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples (AEs) that mislead the model while appearing benign to human observers. A critical concern is the transferability of AEs, which enables black-box attacks without direct access to the target model. However, many previous attacks have failed to explain the intrinsic mechanism of adversarial transferability, lacking a unified and representative metric for transferability as well. In this paper, we rethink the property of transferable AEs and develop a novel metric to measure transferability from the perspective of generalization. Building on insights from this metric, we analyze the generalization of AEs across models with different architectures and prove that we can find a local perturbation to mitigate the gap between surrogate and target models. We further establish the inner connections between model smoothness and flat local maxima, both of which contribute to the transferability of AEs. Further, we propose a new adversarial attack algorithm, Adversarial Weight Tuning (AWT), which adaptively adjusts the parameters of the surrogate model using generated AEs to optimize the flat local maxima and model smoothness simultaneously, without the need for extra data. AWT is a data-free tuning method that combines gradient-based and model-related attack methods to enhance the transferability of AEs. Extensive experiments on a variety of models with different architectures on ImageNet demonstrate that AWT yields superior performance over other attacks, with an average increase of nearly 5% and 10% attack success rates on CNN-based and Transformer-based models, respectively, compared to state-of-the-art attacks. Zhou Feng, Yuwen Pu, Chunyi Zhou 0001, Yuyou Gan, Shouling Ji |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2022 | "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature AttributionabstractNeural networks have become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, understanding their decision process turns out to be complicated. One vital method to explain a models' behavior is feature attribution, i.e., attributing its decision to pivotal features. Although many algorithms are proposed, most of them aim to improve the faithfulness (fidelity) to the model. However, the real environment contains many random noises, which may cause the feature attribution maps to be greatly perturbed for similar images. More seriously, recent works show that explanation algorithms are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, generating the same explanation for a maliciously perturbed input. All of these make the explanation hard to trust in real scenarios, especially in security-critical applications. Yuyou Gan, Yuhao Mao, Xuhong Zhang 0002, Shouling Ji, Yuwen Pu, Jianwei Yin, Ting Wang 0006 |
CCS | 1 |