Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tingyu Luo
dblp:329/4688
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-4962-6183ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 95% Parallel and multicore computing · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | DMapS: End-to-End Qubit Mapping and Routing for Distributed Quantum Computing Architectures · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 Distributed-HISQ: A Distributed Quantum Control Architecture · MICRO 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
distributed quantum computing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DMapS: End-to-End Qubit Mapping and Routing for Distributed Quantum Computing Architectures · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › qubit mapping
qubit mapping and routing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DMapS: End-to-End Qubit Mapping and Routing for Distributed Quantum Computing Architectures · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum software stack
quantum instruction set |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed-HISQ: A Distributed Quantum Control Architecture · MICRO 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing
synchronization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed-HISQ: A Distributed Quantum Control Architecture · MICRO 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-stage mapping · 1.0parallelism exploitation · 1.0SWAP gate insertion · 1.0superconducting qubit control · 0.9booking-based synchronization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DMapS: End-to-End Qubit Mapping and Routing for Distributed Quantum Computing ArchitecturesabstractDistributed quantum computing (DQC) architectures offer a scalable solution for the computational demands of large-scale quantum computing. In near-term DQC architectures, the costly remote quantum communication and the execution cost within quantum chips together significantly limit the execution efficiency of quantum circuits. To comprehensively optimize both costs, we propose DMapS, which consists of end-to-end algorithms for qubit mapping and routing. The qubit mapping component, DMapS-M, adopts a two-stage mapping strategy that decomposes a large quantum circuit into smaller ones and parallelizes the qubit mapping on quantum chips. The qubit routing component, DMapS-R, reduces remote quantum communication overhead by prioritizing the insertion of local SWAP gates and further improves transpilation efficiency by exploiting parallelism within chips. Our experimental results show that DMapS-M reduces overall overhead (including both remote quantum communication overhead and local SWAP gate overhead) by an average of 43.44% and 59.72%, respectively, compared to two baseline algorithms, and achieves an average speedup of 87.05x. DMapS-R, compared to the baseline algorithm, reduces overall overhead by an average of 8.85% and achieves an average transpilation speedup of 2.78×. Moreover, compared to the DQC-oriented quantum compiler, DMapS reduces remote communication overhead by an average of 75.16%. Tingyu Luo, Yuzhen Zheng, Yuxin Deng 0001, Xiang Fu 0003 |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2025 | Distributed-HISQ: A Distributed Quantum Control ArchitectureabstractThe design of a scalable Quantum Control Architecture (QCA) faces two primary challenges.First, the continuous growth in qubit counts has rendered distributed QCA inevitable, yet the nondeterministic latencies inherent in feedback loops demand cycleaccurate synchronization across multiple controllers.Existing synchronization strategies -whether lock-step or demand-drivenintroduce significant performance penalties.Second, existing quantum instruction set architectures are polarized, being either too abstract or too granular.This lack of a unifying design necessitates recurrent hardware customization for each new control requirement, which limits the system's reconfigurability and impedes the path toward a scalable and unified digital microarchitecture.Addressing these challenges, we propose Distributed-HISQ, featuring: (i) HISQ, A universal instruction set that redefines quantum control with a hardware-agnostic design.By decoupling from quantum operation semantics, HISQ provides a unified language for control sequences, enabling a single microarchitecture to support various control methods and enhancing system reconfigurability.(ii) BISP, a booking-based synchronization protocol that can potentially achieve zero-cycle synchronization overhead.The feasibility and adaptability of Distributed-HISQ are validated through its implementation on a commercial quantum control system targeting superconducting qubits.We performed a comprehensive evaluation using a customized quantum software stack.Our results show that BISP effectively synchronizes multiple control boards, leading to a 22.8% reduction in average program execution time and a ∼ 5× reduction in infidelity when compared to an existing lock-step synchronization scheme. Yilun Zhao 0002, Kangding Zhao, Dingdong Liu, Tingyu Luo, Yuzhen Zheng, Shun Hu, Yinhe Han 0001, Ying Wang 0001, Mingtang Deng, Junjie Wu 0003, Xiang Fu 0003 |
MICRO | 5 |