Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Conor Snedeker

dblp:329/4844 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.912025
Private Model Personalization Revisited · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
model personalization
0.912025
Private Model Personalization Revisited · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
Private Model Personalization Revisited · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy analysis › privacy models
user-level differential privacy
0.912025
Private Model Personalization Revisited · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
shared representation learning
0.312025
Private Model Personalization Revisited · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

johnson-lindenstrauss transform · 1.7fedrep · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Private Model Personalization Revisited
abstract
We study model personalization under user-level differential privacy (DP) in the shared representation framework. In this problem, there are $n$ users whose data is statistically heterogeneous, and their optimal parameters share an unknown embedding $U^* \in\mathbb{R}^{d\times k}$ that maps the user parameters in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to low-dimensional representations in $\mathbb{R}^k$, where $k\ll d$. Our goal is to privately recover the shared embedding and the local low-dimensional representations with small excess risk in the federated setting. We propose a private, efficient federated learning algorithm to learn the shared embedding based on the FedRep algorithm in (Collins et al., 2021). Unlike (Collins et al., 2021), our algorithm satisfies differential privacy, and our results hold for the case of noisy labels. In contrast to prior work on private model personalization (Jain et al., 2021), our utility guarantees hold under a larger class of users' distributions (sub-Gaussian instead of Gaussian distributions). Additionally, in natural parameter regimes, we improve the privacy error term in (Jain et al., 2021) by a factor of $\widetilde{O}(dk)$. Next, we consider the binary classification setting. We present an information-theoretic construction to privately learn the shared embedding and derive a margin-based accuracy guarantee that is independent of $d$. Our method utilizes the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform to reduce the effective dimensions of the shared embedding and the users' data. This result shows that dimension-independent risk bounds are possible in this setting under a margin loss.
Conor Snedeker, Raef Bassily
ICML1