Redis (Remote Dictionary Server) is a general purpose, in-memory database that supports a rich array of functionality, including various Probabilistic Data Structures (PDS), such as Bloom filters, Cuckoo filters, as well as cardinality and frequency estimators. These PDS typically perform well in the average case. However, given that Redis is intended to be used across a diverse array of applications, it is crucial to evaluate how these PDS perform under worst-case scenarios, i.e., when faced with adversarial inputs. We offer a comprehensive analysis to address this question. We begin by carefully documenting the different PDS implementations in Redis, explaining how they deviate from those PDS as described in the literature. Then we show that these deviations enable a total of 10 novel attacks that are more severe than the corresponding attacks for generic versions of the PDS. We highlight the critical role of Redis' decision to use non-cryptographic hash functions in the severity of these attacks. We conclude by discussing countermeasures to the attacks

We study the security of Probabilistic Data Structures (PDS) for handling Approximate Membership Queries (AMQ); prominent examples of AMQ-PDS are Bloom and Cuckoo filters. AMQ-PDS are increasingly being deployed in environments where adversaries can gain benefit from carefully selecting inputs, for example to increase the false positive rate of an AMQ-PDS. They are also being used in settings where the inputs are sensitive and should remain private in the face of adversaries who can access an AMQ-PDS through an API or who can learn its internal state by compromising the system running the AMQ-PDS.