Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunnan Yu

dblp:329/5623 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3421-4942ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 54% Security and privacy of machine learning · 25% Network security · 22%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Autonomous driving · 81% Robot navigation and mapping · 19%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security
autonomous vehicle security
1.422024
Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving · MobiCom 2024
TileMask: A Passive-Reflection-based Attack against mmWave Radar Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · CCS 2023
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.812024
Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving · MobiCom 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.712023
TileMask: A Passive-Reflection-based Attack against mmWave Radar Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · CCS 2023
Network security › traffic analysis
malicious traffic analysis
0.612022
An Extensive Study of Residential Proxies in China · CCS 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
LiDAR-camera-radar fusion
0.212024
Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving · MobiCom 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › radar perception
radar object detection
0.212023
TileMask: A Passive-Reflection-based Attack against mmWave Radar Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · CCS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial object · 1.5adversarial object placement · 1.33d printing · 1.3semantic-based classifier · 1.1measurement study · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving
abstract
Multi-sensor fusion has been widely used by autonomous vehicles (AVs) to integrate the perception results from different sensing modalities including LiDAR, camera and radar. Despite the rapid development of multi-sensor fusion systems in autonomous driving, their vulnerability to malicious attacks have not been well studied. Although some prior works have studied the attacks against the perception systems of AVs, they only consider a single sensing modality or a camera-LiDAR fusion system, which can not attack the sensor fusion system based on LiDAR, camera, and radar. To fill this research gap, in this paper, we present the first study on the vulnerability of multi-sensor fusion systems that employ LiDAR, camera, and radar. Specifically, we propose a novel attack method that can simultaneously attack all three types of sensing modalities using a single type of adversarial object. The adversarial object can be easily fabricated at low cost, and the proposed attack can be easily performed with high stealthiness and flexibility in practice. Extensive experiments based on a real-world AV testbed show that the proposed attack can continuously hide a target vehicle from the perception system of a victim AV using only two small adversarial objects.
Yi Zhu 0012, Chenglin Miao, Hongfei Xue, Yunnan Yu, Lu Su 0001, Chunming Qiao
MobiCom4
2023 TileMask: A Passive-Reflection-based Attack against mmWave Radar Object Detection in Autonomous Driving
abstract
In autonomous driving, millimeter wave (mmWave) radar has been widely adopted for object detection because of its robustness and reliability under various weather and lighting conditions. For radar object detection, deep neural networks (DNNs) are becoming increasingly important because they are more robust and accurate, and can provide rich semantic information about the detected objects, which is critical for autonomous vehicles (AVs) to make decisions. However, recent studies have shown that DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Despite the rapid development of DNN-based radar object detection models, there have been no studies on their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Although some spoofing attack methods are proposed to attack the radar sensor by actively transmitting specific signals using some special devices, these attacks require sub-nanosecond-level synchronization between the devices and the radar and are very costly, which limits their practicability in real world. In addition, these attack methods can not effectively attack DNN-based radar object detection. To address the above problems, in this paper, we investigate the possibility of using a few adversarial objects to attack the DNN-based radar object detection models through passive reflection. These objects can be easily fabricated using 3D printing and metal foils at low cost. By placing these adversarial objects at some specific locations on a target vehicle, we can easily fool the victim AV's radar object detection model. The experimental results demonstrate that the attacker can achieve the attack goal by using only two adversarial objects and conceal them as car signs, which have good stealthiness and flexibility. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the passive-reflection-based attacks against the DNN-based radar object detection models using low-cost, readily-available and easily concealable geometric shaped objects.
Yi Zhu 0012, Chenglin Miao, Hongfei Xue, Zhengxiong Li, Yunnan Yu, Wenyao Xu, Lu Su 0001, Chunming Qiao
CCS5
2022 An Extensive Study of Residential Proxies in China
abstract
We carry out the first in-depth characterization of residential proxies (RESIPs) in China, for which little is studied in previous works. Our study is made possible through a semantic-based classifier to automatically capture RESIP services. In addition to the classifier, new techniques have also been identified to capture RESIPs without interacting with and relaying traffic through RESIP services, which can significantly lower the cost and thus allow continuous monitoring of RESIPs. Our RESIP service classifier has achieved good performance with a recall of 99.7% and a precision of 97.6% in 10-fold cross validation. Applying the classifier has identified 399 RESIP services, a much larger set compared to 38 RESIP services collected in all previous works. Our effort of RESIP capturing leads to a collection of 9,077,278 RESIP IPs (51.36% are located in China), 96.70% of which are not covered in publicly available RESIP datasets. An extensive measurement on RESIPs and their services has uncovered a set of interesting findings as well as several security implications. Especially, 80.05% RESIP IPs located in China have sourced at least one malicious traffic flows during 2021, resulting in 52-million malicious traffic flows in total. And RESIPs have also been observed in corporation networks of 559 sensitive organizations including government agencies, education institutions and enterprises. Also, 3,232,698 China RESIP IPs have opened at least one TCP/UDP port for accepting relaying requests, which incurs non-negligible security risks to the local network of RESIPs. Besides, 91% China RESIP IPs are of a lifetime fewer than 10 days while most China RESIP services show up a crest-trough pattern in terms of the daily active RESIPs across time.
Mingshuo Yang, Yunnan Yu, Xianghang Mi, Shujun Tang, Shanqing Guo, Yilin Li 0016, Hai-Xin Duan
CCS2