Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antoine Bambade

dblp:329/6816 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0513-0691ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Reinforcement learning · 3%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
constrained trajectory optimization
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
differential dynamic programming
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › whole-body control
whole-body model predictive control
0.912025
ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization
0.812024
Leveraging augmented-Lagrangian techniques for differentiating over infeasible quadratic programs in machine learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › differentiable optimization
optimization layer
0.812024
Leveraging augmented-Lagrangian techniques for differentiating over infeasible quadratic programs in machine learning · ICLR 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision detection
0.712023
Differentiable Collision Detection: a Randomized Smoothing Approach · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
differentiable simulation
0.212023
Differentiable Collision Detection: a Randomized Smoothing Approach · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

warm-starting · 0.9proximal methods · 0.9differential dynamic programming · 0.9primal-dual method · 0.8augmented lagrangian · 0.8randomized smoothing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ProxDDP: Proximal Constrained Trajectory Optimization
abstract
Trajectory optimization has been a popular choice for motion generation and control in robotics for at least a decade. Several numerical approaches have exhibited the required speed to enable online computation of trajectories for real-time of various systems, including complex robots. Many of these said are based on the differential dynamic programming (DDP) algorithm—initially designed for unconstrained trajectory optimization problems—and its variants, which are relatively easy to implement and provide good runtime performance. However, several problems in robot control call for using constrained formulations (e.g., torque limits, obstacle avoidance), from which several difficulties arise when trying to adapt DDP-type methods: numerical stability, computational efficiency, and constraint satisfaction. In this article, we leverage proximal methods for constrained optimization and introduce a DDP-type method for fast, constrained trajectory optimization suited for model-predictive control (MPC) applications with easy warm-starting. Compared to earlier solvers, our approach effectively manages hard constraints without warm-start limitations and exhibits good convergence behavior. We provide a complete implementation as part of an open-source and flexible C++ trajectory optimization library calledaligator. These algorithmic contributions are validated through several trajectory planning scenarios from the robotics literature and the real-time whole-body MPC of a quadruped robot.
Wilson Jallet, Antoine Bambade, Etienne Arlaud, Sarah El Kazdadi, Nicolas Mansard, Justin Carpentier
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2024 Leveraging augmented-Lagrangian techniques for differentiating over infeasible quadratic programs in machine learning
abstract
Optimization layers within neural network architectures have become increasingly popular for their ability to solve a wide range of machine learning tasks and to model domain-specific knowledge. However, designing optimization layers requires careful consideration as the underlying optimization problems might be infeasible during training. Motivated by applications in learning, control and robotics, this work focuses on convex quadratic programming (QP) layers. The specific structure of this type of optimization layer can be efficiently exploited for faster computations while still allowing rich modeling capabilities. We leverage primal-dual augmented Lagrangian techniques for computing derivatives of both feasible and infeasible QP solutions. More precisely, we propose a unified approach which tackles the differentiability of the closest feasible QP solutions in a classical $\ell_2$ sense. We then harness this approach to enrich the expressive capabilities of existing QP layers. More precisely, we show how differentiating through infeasible QPs during training enables to drive towards feasibility at test time a new range of QP layers. These layers notably demonstrate superior predictive performance in some conventional learning tasks. Additionally, we present alternative formulations that enhance numerical robustness, speed, and accuracy for training such layers. Along with these contributions, we provide an open-source C++ software package called QPLayer for differentiating feasible and infeasible convex QPs and which can be interfaced with modern learning frameworks.
Antoine Bambade, Fabian Schramm, Adrien B. Taylor, Justin Carpentier
ICLR1
2023 Differentiable Collision Detection: a Randomized Smoothing Approach
abstract
Collision detection is an important component of many robotics applications, from robot control to simulation, including motion planning and estimation. While the seminal works on the topic date back to the 80s, it is only recently that the question of properly differentiating collision detection has emerged as a central issue, thanks notably to the ongoing and various efforts made by the scientific community around the topic of differentiable physics. Yet, very few solutions have been suggested so far, and only with a strong assumption on the nature of the shapes involved. In this work, we introduce a generic and efficient approach to compute the derivatives of collision detection for any pair of convex shapes, by notably leveraging randomized smoothing techniques which have shown to be particularly adapted to capture the derivatives of non-smooth problems. This approach is implemented in the HPP-FCL and Pinocchio ecosystems, and evaluated on classic datasets and problems of the robotics literature, demonstrating few micro-second timings to compute informative derivatives directly exploitable by many real robotic applications, including differentiable simulation.
Louis Montaut, Quentin Le Lidec, Antoine Bambade, Vladimír Petrík, Josef Sivic, Justin Carpentier
ICRA3
2022 Constrained Differential Dynamic Programming: A primal-dual augmented Lagrangian approach
abstract
Trajectory optimization is an efficient approach for solving optimal control problems for complex robotic systems. It relies on two key components: first the transcription into a sparse nonlinear program, and second the corresponding solver to iteratively compute its solution. On one hand, differential dynamic programming (DDP) provides an efficient approach to transcribe the optimal control problem into a finite-dimensional problem while optimally exploiting the sparsity induced by time. On the other hand, augmented Lagrangian methods make it possible to formulate efficient algorithms with advanced constraint-satisfaction strategies. In this paper, we propose to combine these two approaches into an efficient optimal control algorithm accepting both equality and inequality constraints. Based on the augmented Lagrangian literature, we first derive a generic primal-dual augmented Lagrangian strategy for nonlinear problems with equality and inequality constraints. We then apply it to the dynamic programming principle to solve the value-greedy optimization problems inherent to the backward pass of DDP, which we combine with a dedicated globalization strategy, resulting in a Newton-like algorithm for solving constrained trajectory optimization problems. Contrary to previous attempts of formu-lating an augmented Lagrangian version of DDP, our approach exhibits adequate convergence properties without any switch in strategies. We empirically demonstrate its interest with several case-studies from the robotics literature.
Wilson Jallet, Antoine Bambade, Nicolas Mansard, Justin Carpentier
IROS2