VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Sheil
dblp:329/9248
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1462-1401ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Graph attention neural network for subsurface stratigraphy on spatial and feature level using multiple-source sparse exploration data
Xiaoqi Zhou, Brian Sheil, Stephen Suryasentana, Peixin Shi |
Adv. Eng. Informatics | 2 |
| 2024 | Knowledge-based U-Net and transfer learning for automatic boundary segmentation
Xiaoqi Zhou, Peixin Shi, Brian Sheil, Stephen Suryasentana |
Adv. Eng. Informatics | 3 |
| 2024 | Multi-fidelity fusion for soil classification via LSTM and multi-head self-attention CNN model
Xiaoqi Zhou, Brian Sheil, Stephen Suryasentana, Peixin Shi |
Adv. Eng. Informatics | 2 |
| 2023 | Entity Embeddings in Deep Learning for the Detection of Anomalous Insar Deformation SignalsabstractA novel methodology for detecting anomalous deformation behaviour from satellite-Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (InSAR) is proposed. The representation of InSAR metadata as embeddings within a deep learning framework (EE-DL) is investigated for modelling the spatio-temporal deformation response. To evaluate the performance of the EE-DL approach in SAR interferometry, we conduct experiments over a mining test site (Cadia, Australia) which has been subject to a tailings storage facility failure. This study demonstrates that EE-DL can detect and predict the fine spatial movement patterns that eventually resulted in the failure. We also compare the results with deformation predictions from a common baseline model, Random Forest. Maral Bayaraa, Cristian Rossi, Freddie Kalaitzis, Brian Sheil |
IGARSS | 4 |
| 2022 | Comparison of Insar and Numerical Modelling for Tailings Dam Monitoring the Cadia Failure, AustraliaabstractGround deformation measurements from Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (InSAR) and ground-based prism mon-itoring are compared to Finite Element (FE) simulation over a collapsed tailings dam. InSAR monitoring captured the complex spatial and temporal variability of TSF deformation that is not be possible from the sparse measurements offered by traditional monitoring. Potentially anomalous deformation over the failed area have been detected from InSAR one year before the failure. The InSAR monitoring data and FE modelling results were in broad agreement with ground based prism measurements, both in terms of magnitude and trends. The results, however, deviate significantly immediately pre-ceding the failure, associated to the construction of buttresses. Finally, this study illustrates the complementarity of remote sensing and geotechnical approaches for the monitoring of tailings dams. Maral Bayaraa, Brian Sheil, Cristian Rossi |
IGARSS | 2 |