VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
John Walker Orr
dblp:33/10549
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event extraction
event detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Event Detection with Neural Networks: A Rigorous Empirical Evaluation · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Prune-and-Score: Learning for Greedy Coreference Resolution · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event understanding
event sequence modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Scripts as Hidden Markov Models · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Scripts as Hidden Markov Models · AAAI 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
script learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Scripts as Hidden Markov Models · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Inverting Grice's Maxims to Learn Rules from Natural Language Extractions · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Inverting Grice's Maxims to Learn Rules from Natural Language Extractions · NIPS 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Inverting Grice's Maxims to Learn Rules from Natural Language Extractions · NIPS 2011 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › maximum likelihood estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Scripts as Hidden Markov Models · AAAI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expectation-maximization · 0.5hidden markov model · 0.4temporal structure · 0.3syntactic information · 0.3attention mechanism · 0.3GRU · 0.3scoring · 0.2pruning · 0.2imitation learning · 0.2markov logic networks · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Event Detection with Neural Networks: A Rigorous Empirical EvaluationabstractDetecting events and classifying them into predefined types is an important step in knowledge extraction from natural language texts.While the neural network models have generally led the state-of-the-art, the differences in performance between different architectures have not been rigorously studied.In this paper we present a novel GRU-based model that combines syntactic information along with temporal structure through an attention mechanism.We show that it is competitive with other neural network architectures through empirical evaluations under different random initializations and training-validationtest splits of ACE2005 dataset. John Walker Orr, Prasad Tadepalli, Xiaoli Z. Fern |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2014 | Learning Scripts as Hidden Markov ModelsabstractScripts have been proposed to model the stereotypical event sequences found in narratives. They can be applied to make a variety of inferences including fillinggaps in the narratives and resolving ambiguous references. This paper proposes the first formal frameworkfor scripts based on Hidden Markov Models (HMMs). Our framework supports robust inference and learning algorithms, which are lacking in previous clustering models. We develop an algorithm for structure andparameter learning based on Expectation Maximizationand evaluate it on a number of natural datasets. The results show that our algorithm is superior to several informed baselines for predicting missing events in partialobservation sequences. John Walker Orr, Prasad Tadepalli, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Thomas G. Dietterich |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2014 | Prune-and-Score: Learning for Greedy Coreference ResolutionabstractChao Ma, Janardhan Rao Doppa, J. Walker Orr, Prashanth Mannem, Xiaoli Fern, Tom Dietterich, Prasad Tadepalli. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2014. Chao Ma 0001, Janardhan Rao Doppa, John Walker Orr, Prashanth Mannem, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Thomas G. Dietterich, Prasad Tadepalli |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2011 | Inverting Grice's Maxims to Learn Rules from Natural Language ExtractionsabstractWe consider the problem of learning rules from natural language text sources. These sources, such as news articles and web texts, are created by a writer to communicate information to a reader, where the writer and reader share substantial domain knowledge. Consequently, the texts tend to be concise and mention the minimum information necessary for the reader to draw the correct conclusions. We study the problem of learning domain knowledge from such concise texts, which is an instance of the general problem of learning in the presence of missing data. However, unlike standard approaches to missing data, in this setting we know that facts are more likely to be missing from the text in cases where the reader can infer them from the facts that are mentioned combined with the domain knowledge. Hence, we can explicitly model this "missingness" process and invert it via probabilistic inference to learn the underlying domain knowledge. This paper introduces a mention model that models the probability of facts being mentioned in the text based on what other facts have already been mentioned and domain knowledge in the form of Horn clause rules. Learning must simultaneously search the space of rules and learn the parameters of the mention model. We accomplish this via an application of Expectation Maximization within a Markov Logic framework. An experimental evaluation on synthetic and natural text data shows that the method can learn accurate rules and apply them to new texts to make correct inferences. Experiments also show that the method out-performs the standard EM approach that assumes mentions are missing at random. Shahed Sorower, Thomas G. Dietterich, Janardhan Rao Doppa, John Walker Orr, Prasad Tadepalli, Xiaoli Z. Fern |
NIPS | 4 |