Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Byungjoo Kim
dblp:33/3138
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 54% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
multi-fidelity bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model watermarking
deep neural network watermarking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Margin-based Neural Network Watermarking · ICML 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Margin-based Neural Network Watermarking · ICML 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
model watermarking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Margin-based Neural Network Watermarking · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Weight Decay Scheduling and Knowledge Distillation for Active Learning · ECCV (26) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Neural Networks Inspired by Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods · ECCV (9) 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Weight Decay Scheduling and Knowledge Distillation for Active Learning · ECCV (26) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Neural Networks Inspired by Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods · ECCV (9) 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.9surrogate modeling · 0.9acquisition function design · 0.9projected gradient ascent · 0.7margin maximization · 0.7weight decay scheduling · 0.4stability preserving methods · 0.4runge-kutta method · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cost-Sensitive Freeze-thaw Bayesian Optimization for Efficient Hyperparameter TuningabstractIn this paper, we address the problem of cost-sensitive hyperparameter optimization (HPO) built upon freeze-thaw Bayesian optimization (BO). Specifically, we assume a scenario where users want to early-stop the HPO process when the expected performance improvement is not satisfactory with respect to the additional computational cost. Motivated by this scenario, we introduce \emph{utility} in the freeze-thaw framework, a function describing the trade-off between the cost and performance that can be estimated from the user's preference data. This utility function, combined with our novel acquisition function and stopping criterion, allows us to dynamically continue training the configuration that we expect to maximally improve the utility in the future, and also automatically stop the HPO process around the maximum utility. Further, we improve the sample efficiency of existing freeze-thaw methods with transfer learning to develop a specialized surrogate model for the cost-sensitive HPO problem. We validate our algorithm on established multi-fidelity HPO benchmarks and show that it outperforms all the previous freeze-thaw BO and transfer-BO baselines we consider, while achieving a significantly better trade-off between the cost and performance. Dong Bok Lee, Aoxuan Silvia Zhang, Byungjoo Kim, Junhyeon Park, Steven Adriaensen, Juho Lee 0001, Sung Ju Hwang, Hae Beom Lee |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Margin-based Neural Network WatermarkingabstractAs Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) platforms become prevalent, deep neural network (DNN) watermarking techniques are gaining increasing attention, which enables one to verify the ownership of a target DNN model in a black-box scenario. Unfortunately, previous watermarking methods are vulnerable to functionality stealing attacks, thus allowing an adversary to falsely claim the ownership of a DNN model stolen from its original owner. In this work, we propose a novel margin-based DNN watermarking approach that is robust to the functionality stealing attacks based on model extraction and distillation. Specifically, during training, our method maximizes the margins of watermarked samples by using projected gradient ascent on them so that their predicted labels cannot change without compromising the accuracy of the model that the attacker tries to steal. We validate our method on multiple benchmarks and show that our watermarking method successfully defends against model extraction attacks, outperforming recent baselines. Byungjoo Kim, Suyoung Lee, Seanie Lee, Sooel Son, Sung Ju Hwang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Robust Neural Networks Inspired by Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods
Byungjoo Kim, Bryce Chudomelka, Jinyoung Park 0005, Jaewoo Kang, Youngjoon Hong, Hyunwoo J. Kim |
ECCV (9) | 1 |
| 2020 | Weight Decay Scheduling and Knowledge Distillation for Active Learning
Juseung Yun, Byungjoo Kim, Junmo Kim 0002 |
ECCV (26) | 2 |