VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Crosby
dblp:33/5678
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 5 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Network optimization and economics · 61% Internet architecture and protocols · 25% Transport protocols and congestion control · 7% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network optimization and economics
admission control |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Implicit admission control · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2000 |
Network optimization and economics › admission control
connection admission control |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Implicit admission control · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2000 |
Internet architecture and protocols
high-speed networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Comparative Study of High Speed Networks · INFOCOM 1998 |
Internet architecture and protocols
ATM networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | In-Call Renegotiation of Traffic Parameters · INFOCOM 1993 |
Network optimization and economics
dynamic resource allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | In-Call Renegotiation of Traffic Parameters · INFOCOM 1993 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | In-Call Renegotiation of Traffic Parameters · INFOCOM 1993 |
Transport protocols and congestion control
TCP performance |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Implicit admission control · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2000 |
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
multiplexer model |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | In-Call Renegotiation of Traffic Parameters · INFOCOM 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0router implementation · 0.0experimental measurement · 0.0renegotiation protocol analysis · 0.0markovian source models · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Implicit admission controlabstractInternet protocols currently use packet-level mechanisms to detect and react to congestion. Although these controls are essential to ensure fair sharing of the available resource between multiple flows, in some cases they are insufficient to ensure overall network stability. We believe that it is also necessary to take account of higher level concepts, such as connections, flows, and sessions when controlling network congestion. This becomes of increasing importance as more real-time traffic is carried on the Internet, since this traffic is less elastic in nature than traditional Web traffic. We argue that, in order to achieve better utility of the network as a whole, higher level congestion controls are required. By way of example, we present a simple connection admission control (CAC) scheme which can significantly improve the overall performance. This paper discusses our motivation for the use of admission control in the Internet, focusing specifically on control for TCP flows. The technique is not TCP specific, and can be applied to any type of flow in a modern IP infrastructure. Simulation results are used to show that it can drastically improve the performance of TCP over bottleneck links. We go on to describe an implementation of our algorithm for a router running the Linux 2.2.9 operating system. We show that by giving routers at bottlenecks the ability to intelligently deny admission to TCP connections, the goodput of existing connections can be significantly increased. Furthermore, the fairness of the resource allocation achieved by TCP is improved. Richard Mortier, Ian Pratt 0001, Simon Crosby |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 4 |
| 1998 | A Comparative Study of High Speed NetworksabstractIn the management of a modern LAN or campus network, two issues are of key importance, namely network performance and capacity planning. In this paper we report on results from an experimental programme which aims to quantify the performance that can be achieved with a real distributed application running over a range of different network technologies, including Ethernet, ATM, FDDI, and a 100 Mb/s packet-switched LAN. In particular we analyse the contribution of each of the various application and network components to the overall performance experienced by applications. James Hall, Roberto Sabatino, Simon Crosby, Ian M. Leslie, Richard Black |
INFOCOM | 3 |
| 1998 | Practical connection admission control for ATM networks based on on-line measurements
John T. Lewis, Raymond Russell, Fergal Toomey, Brian McGurk, Simon Crosby, Ian M. Leslie |
Comput. Commun. | 5 |
| 1997 | Counting the Cycles: a Comparative Study of NFS Performance over High Speed NetworksabstractIn the management of a modern LAN or campus network, two issues are of key importance, namely network performance and capacity planning. In this paper we report on results from an experimental programme which aims to quantify the performance that can be achieved with a real distributed application running over a range of different network technologies, including Ethernet, ATM, FDDI, and a 100 Mb/s packet-switched LAN. In particular we analyse the contribution of each of the various application and network components to the overall performance experienced by applications. This information will facilitate planning and management of new networks, and permit the identification of "hidden costs" which prevent currently deployed applications from fully exploiting high bandwidth networks. James Hall, Roberto Sabatino, Simon Crosby, Ian M. Leslie, Richard Black |
LCN | 3 |
| 1996 | Exploring the Queueing Behaviour of ATM Switches
Nils Björkman, Alexander Latour-Henner, Aziz Miah, Simon Crosby, Ian M. Leslie, M. Davey, Raymond Russell, Fergal Toomey |
Perform. Evaluation | 4 |
| 1993 | In-Call Renegotiation of Traffic ParametersabstractAn approximate model of an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) multiplexer is constructed and used to compare the performances of static and dynamic resource allocation schemes. Static allocation parameterizes a source at connection setup only, whereas dynamic allocation requires a source to inform the multiplexer whenever its bandwidth requirements change. A simple dynamic renegotiation protocol is analyzed, and bounds on the performance of an optimal dynamic protocol are derived. Markovian source models parameterized from working applications are used to contrast the behavior of the three control schemes.> Simon Crosby |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 1990 | Product Form Solutions for Multiserver Centres with Concurrent Classes of Customers
Simon Crosby, Anthony E. Krzesinski |
Perform. Evaluation | 1 |