Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philippe Adjiman
dblp:33/577
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 77% Distributed computing theory · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
consequence finding |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Scalability Study of Peer-to-Peer Consequence Finding · IJCAI 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
peer-to-peer computing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | SomeWhere in the Semantic Web
Marie-Christine Rousset, Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Laurent Simon 0001 |
SOFSEM | 2 |
| 2006 | Distributed Reasoning in a Peer-to-Peer Setting: Application to the Semantic WebabstractIn a peer-to-peer inference system, each peer can reason locally but can also solicit some of its acquaintances, which are peers sharing part of its vocabulary. In this paper, we consider peer-to-peer inference systems in which the local theory of each peer is a set of propositional clauses defined upon a local vocabulary. An important characteristic of peer-to-peer inference systems is that the global theory (the union of all peer theories) is not known (as opposed to partition-based reasoning systems). The main contribution of this paper is to provide the first consequence finding algorithm in a peer-to-peer setting: DeCA. It is anytime and computes consequences gradually from the solicited peer to peers that are more and more distant. We exhibit a sufficient condition on the acquaintance graph of the peer-to-peer inference system for guaranteeing the completeness of this algorithm. Another important contribution is to apply this general distributed reasoning setting to the setting of the Semantic Web through the Somewhere semantic peer-to-peer data management system. The last contribution of this paper is to provide an experimental analysis of the scalability of the peer-to-peer infrastructure that we propose, on large networks of 1000 peers. Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001 |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2005 | Scalability Study of Peer-to-Peer Consequence Finding
Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2004 | Distributed Reasoning in a Peer-to-Peer Setting
Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001 |
ECAI | 1 |