Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philippe Adjiman

dblp:33/577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 77% Distributed computing theory · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
consequence finding
0.112005
Scalability Study of Peer-to-Peer Consequence Finding · IJCAI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

peer-to-peer computing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 SomeWhere in the Semantic Web
Marie-Christine Rousset, Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Laurent Simon 0001
SOFSEM2
2006 Distributed Reasoning in a Peer-to-Peer Setting: Application to the Semantic Web
abstract
In a peer-to-peer inference system, each peer can reason locally but can also solicit some of its acquaintances, which are peers sharing part of its vocabulary. In this paper, we consider peer-to-peer inference systems in which the local theory of each peer is a set of propositional clauses defined upon a local vocabulary. An important characteristic of peer-to-peer inference systems is that the global theory (the union of all peer theories) is not known (as opposed to partition-based reasoning systems). The main contribution of this paper is to provide the first consequence finding algorithm in a peer-to-peer setting: DeCA. It is anytime and computes consequences gradually from the solicited peer to peers that are more and more distant. We exhibit a sufficient condition on the acquaintance graph of the peer-to-peer inference system for guaranteeing the completeness of this algorithm. Another important contribution is to apply this general distributed reasoning setting to the setting of the Semantic Web through the Somewhere semantic peer-to-peer data management system. The last contribution of this paper is to provide an experimental analysis of the scalability of the peer-to-peer infrastructure that we propose, on large networks of 1000 peers.
Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2005 Scalability Study of Peer-to-Peer Consequence Finding
Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001
IJCAI1
2004 Distributed Reasoning in a Peer-to-Peer Setting
Philippe Adjiman, Philippe Chatalic, François Goasdoué, Marie-Christine Rousset, Laurent Simon 0001
ECAI1