Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryota Ozaki 0003
dblp:33/6707-3
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8215-4841ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 71% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025 Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
algorithm selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian optimization · 2.4active preference learning · 1.5acquisition function · 1.5latent space modeling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space
Kazuki Ishikawa 0003, Ryota Ozaki 0003, Yohei Kanzaki, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
KDD (2) | 2 |
| 2024 | Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference LearningabstractThere are a lot of real-world black-box optimization problems that need to optimize multiple criteria simultaneously. However, in a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem, identifying the whole Pareto front requires the prohibitive search cost, while in many practical scenarios, the decision maker (DM) only needs a specific solution among the set of the Pareto optimal solutions. We propose a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach to identifying the most preferred solution in the MOO with expensive objective functions, in which a Bayesian preference model of the DM is adaptively estimated by an interactive manner based on the two types of supervisions called the pairwise preference and improvement request. To explore the most preferred solution, we define an acquisition function in which the uncertainty both in the objective function and the DM preference is incorporated. Further, to minimize the interaction cost with the DM, we also propose an active learning strategy for the preference estimation. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method through the benchmark function optimization and the hyper-parameter optimization problems for machine learning models. Ryota Ozaki 0003, Kazuki Ishikawa 0003, Youhei Kanzaki, Shion Takeno, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama |
AAAI | 1 |