Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Bryson 0001

dblp:33/904 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1163-6368ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 86% Trustworthy machine learning · 9% Generative modeling · 5%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 77% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 23%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.012026
FedKDMR: Robust Federated Learning via Joint Knowledge Distillation & Model Recombination · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
heterogeneous federated learning
1.012026
FedKDMR: Robust Federated Learning via Joint Knowledge Distillation & Model Recombination · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
1.012026
FedKDMR: Robust Federated Learning via Joint Knowledge Distillation & Model Recombination · KDD (1) 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics
0.712023
TopNEXt: automatic DDA exclusion framework for multi-sample mass spectrometry experiments · Bioinform. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312026
FedKDMR: Robust Federated Learning via Joint Knowledge Distillation & Model Recombination · KDD (1) 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolite identification
0.212023
TopNEXt: automatic DDA exclusion framework for multi-sample mass spectrometry experiments · Bioinform. 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
conditional GAN
0.212022
Adversarial generation of gene expression data · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › template-based modeling
fold recognition
0.122001
What are the baselines for protein fold recognition? · Bioinform. 2001
The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.122001
What are the baselines for protein fold recognition? · Bioinform. 2001
The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein disorder prediction
0.012004
The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
secondary structure prediction
0.022004
The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server · Bioinform. 2000
The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure classification
0.012001
What are the baselines for protein fold recognition? · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › membrane protein structure prediction
transmembrane topology prediction
0.012000
The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server · Bioinform. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative adversarial network · 1.1model recombination · 1.0knowledge distillation · 1.0convergence analysis · 1.0region of interest scoring · 0.7intensity-based scoring · 0.7markov chain monte carlo · 0.2gibbs sampling · 0.2probability estimation · 0.0sequence length comparison · 0.0secondary structure alignment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FedKDMR: Robust Federated Learning via Joint Knowledge Distillation & Model Recombination
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) presents a compelling distributed learning paradigm that enables resource-constrained clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while preserving data privacy. However, inter-client data heterogeneity poses fundamental challenges to federated optimization efficacy. Although Knowledge Distillation (KD) effectively addresses model performance alignment under heterogeneity, its inherent constraints restrict client parameter exploration capacity, thus, inducing confinement to suboptimal basins. To reconcile this trade-off, we introduce FedKDMR, a novel FL paradigm unifying KD constraints with exploration via model recombination. FedKDMR imposes global model consistency and robustness in training through dynamic KD while sufficiently harnessing model recombination-induced perturbations for diverse parameter exploration. We establish convergence guarantees for strongly convex and smooth objectives. Extensive experiments on FL benchmark datasets demonstrate that FedKDMR achieves a superior accuracy-robustness trade-off against state-of-the-art methods when tackling non-independent and identically distributed and heterogeneous data in FL environments.
Wenhao Li 0004, Christos Anagnostopoulos 0001, Shameem A. Puthiya Parambath, Kevin Bryson 0001
KDD (1)4
2024 LIFE: Leader-driven Hierarchical & Inclusive Federated Learning
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is used to train machine learning models across distributed data and clients (devices). A key challenge in FL is addressing the complexities posed by heterogeneous clients with varying computational resources. While effective methods like knowledge distillation have been proposed to assist clients with limited resources, prevailing teacher-student models often focus solely on knowledge transfer, neglecting whether student clients can effectively and inclusively assimilate this knowledge. We introduce a leader-driven hierarchical distributed inclusive FL framework (LIFE) to address this challenge. LIFE engages hierarchical leaders across clients with various levels of computational capacities, aiming to optimize the performance of subordinate client models through a novel all-inclusive, leader-driven, level-by-level aggregation. Knowledge distillation is gradually achieved by fine-tuning subordinate models at all levels. Comprehensive experiments and comparisons with state-of-the-art methods across different tasks showcase that LIFE significantly enhances knowledge transfer across a variety of clients in an all-inclusive FL environment.
Wenhao Li 0004, Christos Anagnostopoulos 0001, Shameem A. Puthiya Parambath, Kevin Bryson 0001
IEEE Big Data4
2023 TopNEXt: automatic DDA exclusion framework for multi-sample mass spectrometry experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry experiments aim to produce high-quality fragmentation spectra, which can be used to annotate metabolites. However, current Data-Dependent Acquisition approaches may fail to collect spectra of sufficient quality and quantity for experimental outcomes, and extend poorly across multiple samples by failing to share information across samples or by requiring manual expert input. RESULTS: We present TopNEXt, a real-time scan prioritization framework that improves data acquisition in multi-sample Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry metabolomics experiments. TopNEXt extends traditional Data-Dependent Acquisition exclusion methods across multiple samples by using a Region of Interest and intensity-based scoring system. Through both simulated and lab experiments, we show that methods incorporating these novel concepts acquire fragmentation spectra for an additional 10% of our set of target peaks and with an additional 20% of acquisition intensity. By increasing the quality and quantity of fragmentation spectra, TopNEXt can help improve metabolite identification with a potential impact across a variety of experimental contexts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: TopNEXt is implemented as part of the ViMMS framework and the latest version can be found at https://github.com/glasgowcompbio/vimms. A stable version used to produce our results can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.7468914.
Ross McBride, Joe Wandy, Stefan Weidt, Simon Rogers, Vinny Davies, Rónán Daly, Kevin Bryson 0001
Bioinform.7
2022 Adversarial generation of gene expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput gene expression can be used to address a wide range of fundamental biological problems, but datasets of an appropriate size are often unavailable. Moreover, existing transcriptomics simulators have been criticized because they fail to emulate key properties of gene expression data. In this article, we develop a method based on a conditional generative adversarial network to generate realistic transcriptomics data for Escherichia coli and humans. We assess the performance of our approach across several tissues and cancer-types. RESULTS: We show that our model preserves several gene expression properties significantly better than widely used simulators, such as SynTReN or GeneNetWeaver. The synthetic data preserve tissue- and cancer-specific properties of transcriptomics data. Moreover, it exhibits real gene clusters and ontologies both at local and global scales, suggesting that the model learns to approximate the gene expression manifold in a biologically meaningful way. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available at: https://github.com/rvinas/adversarial-gene-expression. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Ramón Viñas 0001, Helena Andrés-Terré, Pietro Liò, Kevin Bryson 0001
Bioinform.4
2013 SwiftLink: parallel MCMC linkage analysis using multicore CPU and GPU
abstract
MOTIVATION: Linkage analysis remains an important tool in elucidating the genetic component of disease and has become even more important with the advent of whole exome sequencing, enabling the user to focus on only those genomic regions co-segregating with Mendelian traits. Unfortunately, methods to perform multipoint linkage analysis scale poorly with either the number of markers or with the size of the pedigree. Large pedigrees with many markers can only be evaluated with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods that are slow to converge and, as no attempts have been made to exploit parallelism, massively underuse available processing power. Here, we describe SWIFTLINK, a novel application that performs MCMC linkage analysis by spreading the computational burden between multiple processor cores and a graphics processing unit (GPU) simultaneously. SWIFTLINK was designed around the concept of explicitly matching the characteristics of an algorithm with the underlying computer architecture to maximize performance. RESULTS: We implement our approach using existing Gibbs samplers redesigned for parallel hardware. We applied SWIFTLINK to a real-world dataset, performing parametric multipoint linkage analysis on a highly consanguineous pedigree with EAST syndrome, containing 28 members, where a subset of individuals were genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In our experiments with a four core CPU and GPU, SWIFTLINK achieves a 8.5× speed-up over the single-threaded version and a 109× speed-up over the popular linkage analysis program SIMWALK. AVAILABILITY: SWIFTLINK is available at https://github.com/ajm/swiftlink. All source code is licensed under GPLv3.
Alan Medlar, Dorota Glowacka, Horia Stanescu, Kevin Bryson 0001, Robert Kleta
Bioinform.4
2013 Protein function prediction by massive integration of evolutionary analyses and multiple data sources
abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate protein function annotation is a severe bottleneck when utilizing the deluge of high-throughput, next generation sequencing data. Keeping database annotations up-to-date has become a major scientific challenge that requires the development of reliable automatic predictors of protein function. The CAFA experiment provided a unique opportunity to undertake comprehensive 'blind testing' of many diverse approaches for automated function prediction. We report on the methodology we used for this challenge and on the lessons we learnt. METHODS: Our method integrates into a single framework a wide variety of biological information sources, encompassing sequence, gene expression and protein-protein interaction data, as well as annotations in UniProt entries. The methodology transfers functional categories based on the results from complementary homology-based and feature-based analyses. We generated the final molecular function and biological process assignments by combining the initial predictions in a probabilistic manner, which takes into account the Gene Ontology hierarchical structure. RESULTS: We propose a novel scoring function called COmbined Graph-Information Content similarity (COGIC) score for the comparison of predicted functional categories and benchmark data. We demonstrate that our integrative approach provides increased scope and accuracy over both the component methods and the naïve predictors. In line with previous studies, we find that molecular function predictions are more accurate than biological process assignments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in the field. It still remains for the community to invest a great deal of effort to make automated function prediction a useful and routine component in the toolbox of life scientists. As already witnessed in other areas, community-wide blind testing experiments will be pivotal in establishing standards for the evaluation of prediction accuracy, in fostering advancements and new ideas, and ultimately in recording progress.
Domenico Cozzetto, Daniel W. A. Buchan, Kevin Bryson 0001, David T. Jones
BMC Bioinform.3
2006 High throughput profile-profile based fold recognition for the entire human proteome
abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to maintain the most comprehensive structural annotation databases we must carry out regular updates for each proteome using the latest profile-profile fold recognition methods. The ability to carry out these updates on demand is necessary to keep pace with the regular updates of sequence and structure databases. Providing the highest quality structural models requires the most intensive profile-profile fold recognition methods running with the very latest available sequence databases and fold libraries. However, running these methods on such a regular basis for every sequenced proteome requires large amounts of processing power. In this paper we describe and benchmark the JYDE (Job Yield Distribution Environment) system, which is a meta-scheduler designed to work above cluster schedulers, such as Sun Grid Engine (SGE) or Condor. We demonstrate the ability of JYDE to distribute the load of genomic-scale fold recognition across multiple independent Grid domains. We use the most recent profile-profile version of our mGenTHREADER software in order to annotate the latest version of the Human proteome against the latest sequence and structure databases in as short a time as possible. RESULTS: We show that our JYDE system is able to scale to large numbers of intensive fold recognition jobs running across several independent computer clusters. Using our JYDE system we have been able to annotate 99.9% of the protein sequences within the Human proteome in less than 24 hours, by harnessing over 500 CPUs from 3 independent Grid domains. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrates the feasibility of carrying out on demand high quality structural annotations for the proteomes of major eukaryotic organisms. Specifically, we have shown that it is now possible to provide complete regular updates of profile-profile based fold recognition models for entire eukaryotic proteomes, through the use of Grid middleware such as JYDE.
Liam J. McGuffin, Richard T. Smith, Kevin Bryson 0001, Søren-Aksel Sørensen, David T. Jones
BMC Bioinform.3
2004 The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder
abstract
UNLABELLED: Dynamically disordered regions appear to be relatively abundant in eukaryotic proteomes. The DISOPRED server allows users to submit a protein sequence, and returns a probability estimate of each residue in the sequence being disordered. The results are sent in both plain text and graphical formats, and the server can also supply predictions of secondary structure to provide further structural information. AVAILABILITY: The server can be accessed by non-commercial users at http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/disopred/
Jonathan J. Ward, Liam J. McGuffin, Kevin Bryson 0001, Bernard F. Buxton, David T. Jones
Bioinform.3
2001 What are the baselines for protein fold recognition?
abstract
MOTIVATION: What constitutes a baseline level of success for protein fold recognition methods? As fold recognition benchmarks are often presented without any thought to the results that might be expected from a purely random set of predictions, an analysis of fold recognition baselines is long overdue. Given varying amounts of basic information about a protein-ranging from the length of the sequence to a knowledge of its secondary structure-to what extent can the fold be determined by intelligent guesswork? Can simple methods that make use of secondary structure information assign folds more accurately than purely random methods and could these methods be used to construct viable hierarchical classifications? EXPERIMENTS PERFORMED: A number of rapid automatic methods which score similarities between protein domains were devised and tested. These methods ranged from those that incorporated no secondary structure information, such as measuring absolute differences in sequence lengths, to more complex alignments of secondary structure elements. Each method was assessed for accuracy by comparison with the Class Architecture Topology Homology (CATH) classification. Methods were rated against both a random baseline fold assignment method as a lower control and FSSP as an upper control. Similarity trees were constructed in order to evaluate the accuracy of optimum methods at producing a classification of structure. RESULTS: Using a rigorous comparison of methods with CATH, the random fold assignment method set a lower baseline of 11% true positives allowing for 3% false positives and FSSP set an upper benchmark of 47% true positives at 3% false positives. The optimum secondary structure alignment method used here achieved 27% true positives at 3% false positives. Using a less rigorous Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP)-like sensitivity measurement the random assignment achieved 6%, FSSP-59% and the optimum secondary structure alignment method-32%. Similarity trees produced by the optimum method illustrate that these methods cannot be used alone to produce a viable protein structural classification system. CONCLUSIONS: Simple methods that use perfect secondary structure information to assign folds cannot produce an accurate protein taxonomy, however they do provide useful baselines for fold recognition. In terms of a typical CASP assessment our results suggest that approximately 6% of targets with folds in the databases could be assigned correctly by randomly guessing, and as many as 32% could be recognised by trivial secondary structure comparison methods, given knowledge of their correct secondary structures.
Liam J. McGuffin, Kevin Bryson 0001, David T. Jones
Bioinform.2
2000 The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server
abstract
SUMMARY: The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server allows users to submit a protein sequence, perform a prediction of their choice and receive the results of the prediction both textually via e-mail and graphically via the web. The user may select one of three prediction methods to apply to their sequence: PSIPRED, a highly accurate secondary structure prediction method; MEMSAT 2, a new version of a widely used transmembrane topology prediction method; or GenTHREADER, a sequence profile based fold recognition method. AVAILABILITY: Freely available to non-commercial users at http://globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk/psipred/
Liam J. McGuffin, Kevin Bryson 0001, David T. Jones
Bioinform.2