Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Renyu Li
dblp:330/3952
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GAPX: Generalized Autoregressive Paraphrase-Identification X · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
paraphrase identification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GAPX: Generalized Autoregressive Paraphrase-Identification X · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GAPX: Generalized Autoregressive Paraphrase-Identification X · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
positive/negative model separation · 0.6perplexity-based OOD metric · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | GAPX: Generalized Autoregressive Paraphrase-Identification XabstractParaphrase Identification is a fundamental task in Natural Language Processing. While much progress has been made in the field, the performance of many state-of- the-art models often suffer from distribution shift during inference time. We verify that a major source of this performance drop comes from biases introduced by negative examples. To overcome these biases, we propose in this paper to train two separate models, one that only utilizes the positive pairs and the other the negative pairs. This enables us the option of deciding how much to utilize the negative model, for which we introduce a perplexity based out-of-distribution metric that we show can effectively and automatically determine how much weight it should be given during inference. We support our findings with strong empirical results. Renyu Li, Hayden Housen, Ser-Nam Lim |
NeurIPS | 2 |