Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Heckett

dblp:330/4828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 67% Learning theory · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score-based model
0.712023
Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetry · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching
0.712023
Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetry · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
statistical efficiency
0.712023
Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetry · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score matching · 1.3isoperimetric inequality · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Statistical Efficiency of Score Matching: The View from Isoperimetry
Frederic Koehler, Alexander Heckett, Andrej Risteski
ICLR2