Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dari Kimanius

dblp:330/5398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 54% Generative modeling · 23% 3D vision · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
geometric graph neural network
0.712023
A Graph Neural Network Approach to Automated Model Building in Cryo-EM Maps · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
A Graph Neural Network Approach to Automated Model Building in Cryo-EM Maps · ICLR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural biology
0.712023
A Graph Neural Network Approach to Automated Model Building in Cryo-EM Maps · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Sparse Fourier Backpropagation in Cryo-EM Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
volumetric reconstruction
0.612022
Sparse Fourier Backpropagation in Cryo-EM Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology › cryo-electron microscopy
3d reconstruction
0.612022
Sparse Fourier Backpropagation in Cryo-EM Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
cryo-electron microscopy
0.612022
Sparse Fourier Backpropagation in Cryo-EM Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 1.7neural radiance field · 1.7backpropagation · 1.7graph neural network · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Graph Neural Network Approach to Automated Model Building in Cryo-EM Maps
Kiarash Jamali, Dari Kimanius, Sjors H. W. Scheres
ICLR2
2022 Sparse Fourier Backpropagation in Cryo-EM Reconstruction
abstract
Electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) is a powerful method for investigating the structures of protein molecules, with important implications for understanding the molecular processes of life and drug development. In this technique, many noisy, two-dimensional projection images of protein molecules in unknown poses are combined into one or more three-dimensional reconstructions. The presence of multiple structural states in the data represents a major bottleneck in existing processing pipelines, often requiring expert user supervision. Variational auto-encoders (VAEs) have recently been proposed as an attractive means for learning the data manifold of data sets with a large number of different states. These methods are based on a coordinate-based approach, similar to Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF), to make volumetric reconstructions from 2D image data in Fourier-space. Although NeRF is a powerful method for real-space reconstruction, many of the benefits of the method do not transfer to Fourier-space, e.g. inductive bias for spatial locality. We present an approach where the VAE reconstruction is expressed on a volumetric grid, and demonstrate how this model can be trained efficiently through a novel backpropagation method that exploits the sparsity of the projection operation in Fourier-space. We achieve improved results on a simulated data set and at least equivalent results on an experimental data set when compared to the coordinate-based approach, while also substantially lowering computational cost. Our approach is computationally more efficient, especially in inference, enabling interactive analysis of the latent space by the user.
Dari Kimanius, Kiarash Jamali, Sjors H. W. Scheres
NeurIPS1