Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Cadigan

dblp:330/6776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 91% Language models and text generation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
authorship analysis
0.912025
CROSSNEWS: A Cross-Genre Authorship Verification and Attribution Benchmark · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › authorship analysis
authorship attribution
0.912025
CROSSNEWS: A Cross-Genre Authorship Verification and Attribution Benchmark · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › authorship analysis
authorship verification
0.912025
CROSSNEWS: A Cross-Genre Authorship Verification and Attribution Benchmark · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text representation
large language model embeddings
0.312025
CROSSNEWS: A Cross-Genre Authorship Verification and Attribution Benchmark · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

LLM embeddings · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CROSSNEWS: A Cross-Genre Authorship Verification and Attribution Benchmark
abstract
Authorship models have historically generalized poorly to new domains because of the wide distribution of author-identifying signals across domains. In particular, the effects of topic and genre are highly domain-dependent and impact authorship analysis performance greatly. This paper addresses the existing data gap in authorship for these resources by introducing CROSSNEWS, a novel cross-genre dataset that connects formal journalistic articles and casual social media posts. CROSSNEWS is the largest authorship dataset of its kind for supporting both verification and attribution tasks, with comprehensive topic and genre annotations. We use CROSSNEWS to demonstrate that current models exhibit poor performance in genre transfer scenarios, underscoring the need for authorship models robust to genre-specific effects. We also explore SELMA, a new LLM embedding approach for large-scale authorship setups that outperforms existing models in both same-genre and cross-genre settings.
Marcus Ma, Duong Minh Le, Junmo Kang, Yao Dou, John Cadigan, Dayne Freitag, Alan Ritter, Wei Xu 0004
AAAI5
2022 Valet: Rule-Based Information Extraction for Rapid Deployment
abstract
We present VALET, a framework for rule-based information extraction written in Python. VALET departs from legacy approaches predicated on cascading finite-state transducers, instead offering direct support for mixing heterogeneous information–lexical, orthographic, syntactic, corpus-analytic–in a succinct syntax that supports context-free idioms. We show how a handful of rules suffices to implement sophisticated matching, and describe a user interface that facilitates exploration for development and maintenance of rule sets. Arguing that rule-based information extraction is an important methodology early in the development cycle, we describe an experiment in which a VALET model is used to annotate examples for a machine learning extraction model. While learning to emulate the extraction rules, the resulting model generalizes them, recognizing valid extraction targets the rules failed to detect.
Dayne Freitag, John Cadigan, Robert Sasseen, Paul Kalmar
LREC2