Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Miroslav Krabec

dblp:330/8930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
3d object classification
0.612022
Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification Approaches · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape representation
0.612022
Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification Approaches · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.6deep neural network · 0.6benchmarking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification Approaches
abstract
Classification of 3D objects - the selection of a category in which each object belongs - is of great interest in the field of machine learning. Numerous researchers use deep neural networks to address this problem, altering the network architecture and representation of the 3D shape used as an input. To investigate the effectiveness of their approaches, we conduct an extensive survey of existing methods and identify common ideas by which we categorize them into a taxonomy. Second, we evaluate 11 selected classification networks on two 3D object datasets, extending the evaluation to a larger dataset on which most of the selected approaches have not been tested yet. For this, we provide a framework for converting shapes from common 3D mesh formats into formats native to each network, and for training and evaluating different classification approaches on this data. Despite being partially unable to reach the accuracies reported in the original papers, we compare the relative performance of the approaches as well as their performance when changing datasets as the only variable to provide valuable insights into performance on different kinds of data. We make our code available to simplify running training experiments with multiple neural networks with different prerequisites.
Martin Mirbauer, Miroslav Krabec, Jaroslav Krivánek, Elena Sikudová
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2