Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Miroslav Krabec
dblp:330/8930
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
3d object classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification Approaches · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape representation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification Approaches · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.6deep neural network · 0.6benchmarking · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Survey and Evaluation of Neural 3D Shape Classification ApproachesabstractClassification of 3D objects - the selection of a category in which each object belongs - is of great interest in the field of machine learning. Numerous researchers use deep neural networks to address this problem, altering the network architecture and representation of the 3D shape used as an input. To investigate the effectiveness of their approaches, we conduct an extensive survey of existing methods and identify common ideas by which we categorize them into a taxonomy. Second, we evaluate 11 selected classification networks on two 3D object datasets, extending the evaluation to a larger dataset on which most of the selected approaches have not been tested yet. For this, we provide a framework for converting shapes from common 3D mesh formats into formats native to each network, and for training and evaluating different classification approaches on this data. Despite being partially unable to reach the accuracies reported in the original papers, we compare the relative performance of the approaches as well as their performance when changing datasets as the only variable to provide valuable insights into performance on different kinds of data. We make our code available to simplify running training experiments with multiple neural networks with different prerequisites. Martin Mirbauer, Miroslav Krabec, Jaroslav Krivánek, Elena Sikudová |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |