VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Wilton
dblp:331/3173
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2846-4408ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 31% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › efficient graph learning › data-efficient graph learning
active learning on graphs |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Cluster-based Open-World Graph Active Learning · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Cluster-based Open-World Graph Active Learning · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
open-world graph learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Cluster-based Open-World Graph Active Learning · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
robust loss functions |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
robustness to label noise |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Positive-Unlabeled Learning using Random Forests via Recursive Greedy Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › tree ensembles
random forest |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Positive-Unlabeled Learning using Random Forests via Recursive Greedy Risk Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical clustering · 2.0active learning · 2.0random forest · 1.1decision tree learning · 1.1negative exponential loss · 0.8distribution loss · 0.8conservative loss · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hierarchical Cluster-based Open-World Graph Active Learning
Yayong Li, Zhengyi Du, Jonathan Wilton, Jinran Wu, Zongli Liu |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2024 | Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy LabelsabstractWe consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. Our contributions are threefold. First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss. Jonathan Wilton |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Positive-Unlabeled Learning using Random Forests via Recursive Greedy Risk MinimizationabstractThe need to learn from positive and unlabeled data, or PU learning, arises in many applications and has attracted increasing interest. While random forests are known to perform well on many tasks with positive and negative data, recent PU algorithms are generally based on deep neural networks, and the potential of tree-based PU learning is under-explored. In this paper, we propose new random forest algorithms for PU-learning. Key to our approach is a new interpretation of decision tree algorithms for positive and negative data as \emph{recursive greedy risk minimization algorithms}. We extend this perspective to the PU setting to develop new decision tree learning algorithms that directly minimizes PU-data based estimators for the expected risk. This allows us to develop an efficient PU random forest algorithm, PU extra trees. Our approach features three desirable properties: it is robust to the choice of the loss function in the sense that various loss functions lead to the same decision trees; it requires little hyperparameter tuning as compared to neural network based PU learning; it supports a feature importance that directly measures a feature's contribution to risk minimization. Our algorithms demonstrate strong performance on several datasets. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/puetpaper/PUExtraTrees}. Jonathan Wilton, Abigail M. Y. Koay, Ryan Kok Leong Ko, Miao Xu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |