Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Deon R. Jordan

dblp:331/3640 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 33% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
algorithm selection
0.612022
Data-Efficient Pipeline for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Data · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.612022
Data-Efficient Pipeline for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Data · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.612022
Data-Efficient Pipeline for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Data · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model selection · 0.6data splitting · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Data-Efficient Pipeline for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Data
abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) can be used to improve future performance by leveraging historical data. There exist many different algorithms for offline RL, and it is well recognized that these algorithms, and their hyperparameter settings, can lead to decision policies with substantially differing performance. This prompts the need for pipelines that allow practitioners to systematically perform algorithm-hyperparameter selection for their setting. Critically, in most real-world settings, this pipeline must only involve the use of historical data. Inspired by statistical model selection methods for supervised learning, we introduce a task- and method-agnostic pipeline for automatically training, comparing, selecting, and deploying the best policy when the provided dataset is limited in size. In particular, our work highlights the importance of performing multiple data splits to produce more reliable algorithm-hyperparameter selection. While this is a common approach in supervised learning, to our knowledge, this has not been discussed in detail in the offline RL setting. We show it can have substantial impacts when the dataset is small. Compared to alternate approaches, our proposed pipeline outputs higher-performing deployed policies from a broad range of offline policy learning algorithms and across various simulation domains in healthcare, education, and robotics. This work contributes toward the development of a general-purpose meta-algorithm for automatic algorithm-hyperparameter selection for offline RL.
Allen Nie, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Deon R. Jordan, William Steenbergen, Emma Brunskill
NeurIPS3